Autentyzm zabytków architektury (od „dostojnej mumii" do „postzabytku”)

Grzegorz Bukal

doi:10.35784/odk.7204

Open full text

pdf

Open full text

pdf (Język Polski)

Published: Dec 22, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.7204

Issue No. 24 (2025)

Articles

Recent discussions on authenticity: the risk of an involution
Stefano Gizzi

1-15
Expertise Under Question
The Shifting Authority of Heritage Professionals in the Context of Heritage Developments in Pakistan
Ayesha Agha Shah

17-32
Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Jelka Pirkovič

33-46
The burden of excess. Issues in Unified Management Policy for Gdańsk’s Five Historic Monuments
Bogumiła Mączkowska, Piotr Samól

47-67
Renegotiating the Role of the Expert
The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in Conservation
Nigel Walter

69-83
Endangered 20th-Century Heritage in Belgrade (Serbia)
Strategies for Safeguarding and Preservation
Dubravka Đukanović, Sanja Kesić Ristić

85-104
Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Gilly Carr

105-124
Impact of the Nara Document on Authenticity – case of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Banská Štiavnica
Katarína Terao Vošková, Assoc. prof. Andrea Urland

125-141
‘Gdynia Modernist City Centre’ as a Polish Candidate for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Robert Hirsch, Celina Łozowska

143-157
Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Caterina Ruscio, Francesca Spadolini

159-171
Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"
Grzegorz Bukal

173-184

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.7204

Authors

Grzegorz Bukal

bukal@post.pl

Politechnika Gdańska, Poland

Abstract

The paper presents the author's voice in the discussion on the authenticity of architectural monuments. It refers to the concept of authenticity, the problem of its relativization, tests the WHL ”authenticity test” for common monuments, and proposes the concept of ”post-monument” as an equivalent of post-truth

Keywords:

auyhenticity, architectural monument, post-truth

References

Białostocki, J. (1978). Refleksje i syntezy ze świata sztuki. Warszawa: PWN.

Bold, J., Larkham, P. , Pickard R. (Ed.). (2018). Authentic Reconstruction. Authenticity, Architecture and the Built Heritage. London-New York: Bloomsbury.

Bukal, G. (2022). Zamek w Malborku – zabytek w epoce postprawdy. [in:] Prace konserwatorskie wzespole kościoła NMP w Malborku. Próba podsumowania. Materiały z VIII Konferencji Naukowej z cyklu „Spotkania Malborskie im. Macieja Kilarskiego”. Red. W. Połom-Jakubowicz, J. Trupinda. Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

Chrzanowski – Dyskusje nad słownikiem pojęć mają w Polsce długa tradycję; zob. np. Chrzanowski, T. (1977), Rekonstrukcja – odtwarzanie – makieta. Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury, XI (s. 93-104).

Glendinning, M. (2013). The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation. Antiquity to Modrnity. London: Routledge.

Guedelon. https://www.guedelon.fr (dostęp 30.01.2025).

Jokilehto, J. (2008), A History of Archtectural Conservation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Le Monde, 28.01.2025. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2025/01/28/macron-lays-out-ambitious-renovation-plan-for-louvre-museum_6737526_7.html (dostęp 30.01.2025).

Munjeri, D. (2001). The notions of integrity and authenticity: the emerging patterns in Africa. Expert meeting. Ed. G. Saouma-Forero, Great Zimbabwe, 26/29 May, 2000, UNESCO, Paris (s. 17-19).

Muñoz-Viñas, S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2024 https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (dostęp 22.01.2025).

Riegl, A. (1903). Der moderne Denkmalkultus sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. Wien: K.K. Zentral-Kommision fűr Kunst – und historische Denkmale (s. 5). https://diglib.tugraz.at/der-moderne-denkmalkultus-1903 (dostęp 22.01.2025).

Stovel H. (2020). Origins and influence of the Nara document on authenticity. Conversaciones… con Herb Stovel, 8 (s. 12-30).

The Nara document on authenticity 1994. https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/386-the-nara-document - on-authenticity-1994 (dostęp 22.01.2025).

The Yamato Declaration on Integrated Approaches for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage (Annex I). [in:] The International Conference on “The Safeguarding of Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach” (Nara, Japan, 19-23 October 2004).

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137634 (dostęp 25.01.2025).

Zsolt Szakács, B. (2012). Santo Stefano Rotondo through the Glasses of the Renaissance – and without Them. [in:] Art History – the Future in Now. Studies in Honour of Professor Vladimir P. Goss. Ed. M. Cepetić et al., Rijeka: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (s. 216-256).

Bukal, G. (2025). Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument". Protection of Cultural Heritage, (24), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.7204

Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"

Issue No. 24 (2025)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Article Sidebar

Issue No. 24 (2025)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License