Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 24 (2025)
-
Recent discussions on authenticity: the risk of an involution
Stefano Gizzi1-15
-
Expertise Under Question
The Shifting Authority of Heritage Professionals in the Context of Heritage Developments in PakistanAyesha Agha Shah17-32 -
Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Jelka Pirkovič33-46
-
The burden of excess. Issues in Unified Management Policy for Gdańsk’s Five Historic Monuments
Bogumiła Mączkowska, Piotr Samól47-67
-
Renegotiating the Role of the Expert
The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in ConservationNigel Walter69-83 -
Endangered 20th-Century Heritage in Belgrade (Serbia)
Strategies for Safeguarding and PreservationDubravka Đukanović, Sanja Kesić Ristić85-104 -
Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Gilly Carr105-124
-
Impact of the Nara Document on Authenticity – case of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Banská Štiavnica
Katarína Terao Vošková, Assoc. prof. Andrea Urland125-141
-
‘Gdynia Modernist City Centre’ as a Polish Candidate for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Robert Hirsch, Celina Łozowska143-157
-
Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Caterina Ruscio, Francesca Spadolini159-171
-
Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"
Grzegorz Bukal173-184
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This paper considers authenticity at sites of Holocaust heritage through the eyes of the IHRA Charter for Safeguarding Sites, exploring the importance of authenticity for providing proof of the past and avoiding Holocaust denial and distortion. Drawing on a variety of case studies from across Europe, it examines authenticity in both physical reconstructions and restorations, as well as in the atmosphere at these sites. It concludes by asking whether arguing about the acceptability of inauthenticity and its limits is ultimately a distraction. The real problem today is Holocaust distortion, and elements at sites which contribute to that, and tell false narratives of past, are where heritage professionals at such sites should place their energies.
Keywords:
References
Araoz, G.F. (2011). Preserving heritage places under a new paradigm. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 55-60.
Beech, J. (2009). Genocide tourism. In: Sharpley, R. & Stone, P.R. (eds), The Darker Side of Travel: The theory and practice of dark tourism. (207-223): Bristol: Channel View Publications.
Benjamin, W. (1985). Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
Carr, G., & Cooke, S. (2024). The pragmatics of Holocaust heritage in the 21st century: exploring the concept using the case studies of Terezín and Staro Sajmište. Heritage and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2024.2423319.
Charlesworth, A., & Addis, M. (2002). Memorialisation and the ecological landscapes of Holocaust sites: the cases of Plaszow and Auschwitz-Birkenau. Landscape Research, 27, 229-251.
Cole, T. (2020). Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler. How history is bought, packaged and sold. New York and London: Routledge.
Dalton, D. (2009). Encountering Auschwitz: A personal rumination on the possibilities and limitations of witnessing / remembering trauma in memorial space. Law Text Culture, 13, 187-225.
DeSilvey, C. (2012). Making sense of transience: an anticipatory history. Cultural Geographies, 19(1), 31-54.
DeSilvey, C., Fredheim, H., Fluck, H., Hails, R., Harrison, R., Samuel, I., & Blundell, A. (2021). When loss is more: from managed decline to adaptive release. The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 12(3-4), 418-433.
Farmer, S. (1999). Martyred Village: Commemorating the 1944 massacre at Oradour-sur-Glane. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Hodgkinson, S. (2013). The concentration camp as a site of ‘dark tourism’. Témoigner: Entre histoire et mémoire, 116, 22-32.
Holtorf, C. (2015). Averting loss aversion in cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(4), 405-421.
Holtorf, C., & Schadla-Hall (1999). Age as Artefact: On Archaeological Authenticity. European Journal of Archaeology, 2(2), 229-247.
Keil, C. (2005). Sightseeing in the mansions of the dead. Social and Cultural Geography, 6(4), 479-494.
Luppi, M., & Schintu, F. (2020). Difficult heritage: The experience of the Fossoli Camp Foundation. EX NOVO Journal of Archaeology, 5, 47-61.
Martínez de Arbulo, A. (2023). The Ship of Theseus: a misleading paradox? The authenticity of wooden built heritage in Japanese conservation practice. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 29(2), 151-167.
Moshenska, G. (2015). Curated ruins and the endurance of conflict heritage. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 17(1), 77-90.
Pahor, B. (2020)[1967]. Necropolis. Edinburgh: Canongate.
Seaton, T. (2009). Purposeful otherness: Approaches to the management of thanatourism. In: Sharpley, R., & Stone, P. (eds.), The Darker Side of Travel: The theory and practice of dark tourism. (75-108). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
Tyndall, A. (2004). Memory, authenticity and replication of the Shoah in museums. In: R. Lentin (ed.), Re-presenting the Shoah for the 21st Century. (111-125): New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Verschure, P., & Wierenga, S. (2022). Future memory: a digital humanities approach for the preservation and presentation of the history of the Holocaust and Nazi crimes. Holocaust Studies, 28(3), 331-357.
Waagen, J., Lanjouw, T., & de Kleijn, M. (2023). A virtual place of memory: Virtual reality as a method for communicating conflicted heritage at Camp Westerbork. Heritage, Memory and Conflict Journal, 3, 87-93.
Article Details
Abstract views: 21

