Renegotiating the Role of the Expert The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in Conservation
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 24 (2025)
-
Recent discussions on authenticity: the risk of an involution
Stefano Gizzi1-15
-
Expertise Under Question
The Shifting Authority of Heritage Professionals in the Context of Heritage Developments in PakistanAyesha Agha Shah17-32 -
Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Jelka Pirkovič33-46
-
The burden of excess. Issues in Unified Management Policy for Gdańsk’s Five Historic Monuments
Bogumiła Mączkowska, Piotr Samól47-67
-
Renegotiating the Role of the Expert
The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in ConservationNigel Walter69-83 -
Endangered 20th-Century Heritage in Belgrade (Serbia)
Strategies for Safeguarding and PreservationDubravka Đukanović, Sanja Kesić Ristić85-104 -
Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Gilly Carr105-124
-
Impact of the Nara Document on Authenticity – case of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Banská Štiavnica
Katarína Terao Vošková, Assoc. prof. Andrea Urland125-141
-
‘Gdynia Modernist City Centre’ as a Polish Candidate for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Robert Hirsch, Celina Łozowska143-157
-
Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Caterina Ruscio, Francesca Spadolini159-171
-
Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"
Grzegorz Bukal173-184
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (the Faro Convention) was a significant development in conservation and heritage understanding. In ‘recognising the need to put people and human values at the centre of an enlarged and cross-disciplinary concept of cultural heritage’ (Preamble), it questions the role of conventional heritage expertise. In effect, it suggests that this role should be renegotiated, for the benefit of both cultural heritage and society at large. Heritage professionals have yet to engage fully with the far-reaching implications of this. Clearly, there are very real dangers to both cultural heritage and society in ignoring heritage expertise; but what often goes unrecognised are the equal and opposite dangers of ignoring the interests of those communities that form around historic buildings and in turn, are formed by them. Heritage expertise, typically clothed in the language of the ’scientific’, is often deployed to make ownership claims over the heritage in question, and to oppose judicious change; yet, if anyone can be said to 'own' these buildings, it is the core community that still animates them. This paper considers the relationship between experts and non-professionals through an examination of examples of English Parish churches that have undergone change. A concern for these churches, and the issues of ownership and preservation, were essential ingredients in the birth of modern conservation in the UK through William Morris's 1877 Manifesto for the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. These buildings remain contested, yet the governance system for change provides opportunity for dialogue between heritage experts and stakeholders. Presenting some key examples of attempted change, this paper examines the permissions system for church buildings in England and the implications for the relationship between experts and communities.
Keywords:
References
Brandi, Cesare. ‘Theory of Restoration’. In Theory of Restoration, edited by Giuseppe Basile, translated by Cynthia Rockwell, 43–170. 1963. Reprint, Firenze: Nardini Editore, 2005.
Council of Europe. ‘Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society’, 2005. https://rm.coe.int/1680083746.
Court of Arches. ‘Re St Alkmund Duffield [2012] Fam 158’, 2012. www.ecclesiasticallawassociation.org.uk/judgments/reordering/duffieldstalkmund2012appeal.pdf.
Ecclesiastical Law Association. ‘Judgments Index’. Accessed 9 May 2025. https://www.ecclesiasticallawassociation.org.uk/index.php/judgements/judgments-a-z.
General Synod of the Church of England. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Care of Churches Measure 2018, Pub. L. No. No. 3 (2018). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/2018/3/pdfs/ukcm_20180003_en.pdf.
Hardy, Thomas. ‘Memories of Church Restoration’. In Thomas Hardy’s Personal Writings. Prefaces, Literary Opinions, Reminiscences, edited by Harold Orel, 203–18. 1906. Reprint, London and Melbourne: Macmillan, 1967.
Historic England. New Work in Historic Places of Worship. 2nd ed. London: English Heritage, 2012. http://www.hrballiance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/places-of-worship-2012.pdf.
ICOMOS. International Charter on the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. Paris: ICOMOS, 1964.
Jokilehto, Jukka. A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
———. ‘The Context of the Venice Charter (1964)’. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 2, no. 4 (January 1998): 229–33. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050398793138762.
Locke, William John. ‘Recommendations of the Madrid Conference’. The Architectural Journal, Being the Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects XI (1904): 343–46.
Morris, William. ‘The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings Manifesto’, 2018. https://www.spab.org.uk/about-us/spab-manifesto.
National Churches Trust. ‘The House of Good - the Value of Churches to the UK Economy’. The House of Good, 2025. https://www.houseofgood.nationalchurchestrust.org/.
Palmer, Robert. ‘Preface’. In Heritage and Beyond, by Council of Europe, 7–8. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2009.
Poulios, Ioannis. The Past in the Present : A Living Heritage Approach - Meteora, Greece. London: Ubiquity Press, 2014. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/33207.
Schofield, A. John. ‘Heritage Expertise and the Everyday : Citizens and Authority in the Twenty-First Century’. In Who Needs Experts? : Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage, edited by A. John Schofield, 1–11. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.
Smith, Laurajane. ‘The Venice Charter at Sixty: Old and New Challenges’. In Revisiting the Venice Charter: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges, 1–15. Ouro Preto, Brazil, 2024. https://www.academia.edu/126326145/The_Venice_Charter_at_Sixty_Old_and_new_challenges.
Stovel, Herb, Nicholas Stanley-Price, and Robert G Killick, eds. Conservation of Living Religious Heritage : Papers from the ICCROM 2003 Forum on Living Religious Heritage: Conserving the Sacred. ICCROM Conservation Studies 3. Rome: ICCROM, 2005.
Walter, Nigel. ‘Case Study: St Alkmund, Duffield, and the Ecclesiastical Exemption’. In Narrative Theory in Conservation: Change and Living Buildings, 110–23. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2020.
Narrative Theory in Conservation: Change and Living Buildings. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2020.
‘The Narrative Approach to Living Heritage’. Protection of Cultural Heritage 10 (2020): 126–38. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2443.
“To Live Is to Change”: Tradition, Narrative and Community in the Conservation of Church Buildings’. PhD, University of York, 2017.
Wijesuriya, Gamini. ‘Living Heritage’. In Sharing Conservation Decisions, edited by Alison Heritage and Jennifer Copithorne, 43–56. Rome: ICCROM, 2018. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/sharing_conservation_decisions_2018_web.pdf.
Article Details
Abstract views: 21

