Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 24 (2025)
-
Recent discussions on authenticity: the risk of an involution
Stefano Gizzi1-15
-
Expertise Under Question
The Shifting Authority of Heritage Professionals in the Context of Heritage Developments in PakistanAyesha Agha Shah17-32 -
Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Jelka Pirkovič33-46
-
The burden of excess. Issues in Unified Management Policy for Gdańsk’s Five Historic Monuments
Bogumiła Mączkowska, Piotr Samól47-67
-
Renegotiating the Role of the Expert
The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in ConservationNigel Walter69-83 -
Endangered 20th-Century Heritage in Belgrade (Serbia)
Strategies for Safeguarding and PreservationDubravka Đukanović, Sanja Kesić Ristić85-104 -
Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Gilly Carr105-124
-
Impact of the Nara Document on Authenticity – case of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Banská Štiavnica
Katarína Terao Vošková, Assoc. prof. Andrea Urland125-141
-
‘Gdynia Modernist City Centre’ as a Polish Candidate for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Robert Hirsch, Celina Łozowska143-157
-
Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Caterina Ruscio, Francesca Spadolini159-171
-
Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"
Grzegorz Bukal173-184
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of heritage management theory in Europe, focusing on the Faro Convention.
International heritage conventions emphasise integrated conservation, while the concept of heritage addresses preservation methods. The Faro Convention highlights the importance of heritage values to contemporary societies. Despite receiving only 25 ratifications from 46 Council of Europe member states, the Faro Convention principles significantly influence European heritage trends and beyond.
The Convention defines principles that connect heritage values, communities, and national policies. It requires state parties to articulate the public interest in integrated heritage conservation by identifying, studying, evaluating, protecting, conserving, and interpreting heritage. These processes should involve heritage communities as right-holders, representing a key innovation of the Convention.
Lastly, the Convention outlines tools for spatial planning and intervention, along with other themes, creating a solid foundation for democratising heritage policies.
Keywords:
References
Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. (Trans. Ross, V. D.) Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Bold, J. (2013). Sustaining Heritage in South-East Europe: Working with the Council of Europe, 2003–10. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 4(1), 75-86.
Bold, J. & Pickard, R. (eds.) (2018). An Integrated Approach To Cultural Heritage: The Council of Europe's Technical Cooperation and Consultancy Programme. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Clark, K. (2001). From regulation to participation: cultural heritage, sustainable development and citizenship (103–112). In Forward Planning: The Function of Cultural Heritage in a Changing Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, Faro 2005.
Council of Europe (2017). Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Cultural Heritage Strategy for the 21st Century (CM/Rec(2017)1), https://rm.coe.int/european-heritage-strategy-for-the-21st-century-strategy-21-full-text/16808ae270.
Danakas, A. (2019). The Constitutional Regulation of the Protection of the Hellenic Cultural Heritage and the Content of the Relevant Human Right. (Master thesis). Thessaloniki: International Hellenic University, https://core.ac.uk/download/236205585.pdf.
Dolff-Bonekämper, G. (ed.) (2004). Dividing lines, connecting lines: Europe's cross-border heritage (Responses to violence in everyday life in a democratic society). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Dolff-Bonekämper, G. (2009). The social and spatial frameworks of heritage: What is new in the Faro Convention? (69-74). In Heritage and Beyond. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Fabbricatti, K., Boissenin, L. & Citoni, M. (2020). Heritage Community Resilience: towards new approaches for urban resilience and sustainability. City, Territory and Architecture 7 (17), 1-20. https://cityterritoryarchitecture.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40410-020-00126-7.
Fiorentini, F., Hausler, K. & Jakubowski, A. (2021). Cultural heritage and European identity in European Union law and policy (99-111). In A Research Agenda for Heritage Planning: Perspectives from Europe. Stegmeijer, E. & Veldpaus, L. (eds.) Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
International Law Association (2022). Participation in Global Cultural Heritage Governance: Lisbon Conference Final Report, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4220401.
Jakubowski, A. (2011). The effects of state succession on cultural property: Ownership, control, protection. https://doi.org/10.2870/08426.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
Meyer-Bisch, P. (2024). Leçons apprises avec le déploiement des droits culturels. Nectart, 20 (3), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.3917/nect.020.0028.
Pickard, R. (2002). European Cultural Heritage: A Review of Policies and Practice (Volume II). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Pirkovič, J. (2009). Unpacking the convention into challenging actions for member states (23-27). In Heritage and Beyond. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Schofield, J. (2015). Forget About ‘Heritage’: Place, Ethics and the Faro Convention (197-209). In The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. Ireland, T. & Schofield, J. (eds.) New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
Urbinati, S. (2015). The Community Participation in International Law (123–140). In Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice. Adell, N. et al. (eds.) Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Vadi, V. (2023). Cultural Heritage in International Economic Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill|Nijhoff, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/86581/9789004347823.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Zagato, L. (2015). The notion of "Heritage Community in the Council of Europe's Faro Convention: Its Impact on the European legal framework (141-168). In Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice. Adell, N. et al. (eds.)Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Zhao, Xiaoxin, Chen, Jinliu, Li, Jiayi, Wang, Haoqi, Zhang, Xinyu & Yu, Fangshu (2025). Unravelling the renewal priority of urban heritage communities via macro-micro dimensional assessment: A case study of Nanjing City, China. Sustainable Cities and Societies 124 (4).
Article Details
Abstract views: 18

