Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 24 (2025)
-
Recent discussions on authenticity: the risk of an involution
Stefano Gizzi1-15
-
Expertise Under Question
The Shifting Authority of Heritage Professionals in the Context of Heritage Developments in PakistanAyesha Agha Shah17-32 -
Faro Convention's Implications for Heritage Theory and Practice
Jelka Pirkovič33-46
-
The burden of excess. Issues in Unified Management Policy for Gdańsk’s Five Historic Monuments
Bogumiła Mączkowska, Piotr Samól47-67
-
Renegotiating the Role of the Expert
The Faro Convention, Historic Churches and the Role of Communities in ConservationNigel Walter69-83 -
Endangered 20th-Century Heritage in Belgrade (Serbia)
Strategies for Safeguarding and PreservationDubravka Đukanović, Sanja Kesić Ristić85-104 -
Holocaust heritage and its problems with authenticity
Gilly Carr105-124
-
Impact of the Nara Document on Authenticity – case of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Banská Štiavnica
Katarína Terao Vošková, Assoc. prof. Andrea Urland125-141
-
‘Gdynia Modernist City Centre’ as a Polish Candidate for the UNESCO World Heritage List
Robert Hirsch, Celina Łozowska143-157
-
Revitalising Fontecchio: a community-led approach to heritage conservation and cultural regeneration
Caterina Ruscio, Francesca Spadolini159-171
-
Authenticity of architectural monuments. From a "honourable mummy" to a "post-monument"
Grzegorz Bukal173-184
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This paper examines the post-earthquake recovery and cultural regeneration of Fontecchio, a medieval village in L’Aquila, Italy, through a community-led approach to heritage conservation. Fontecchio was the first Italian municipality to adopt the principles of the Faro Convention, emphasizing democratic participation and the recognition of cultural heritage as a living resource. Drawing on direct site engagement, participatory workshops, and documentary analysis, this study investigates how local communities contribute to the preservation of tangible and intangible heritage, including traditions such as the Festa della Perdonanza. Findings demonstrate that community involvement not only facilitates the physical reconstruction of the village but also reinforces social cohesion, cultural identity, and sustainable territorial development. This case illustrates the potential of participatory heritage strategies to generate both practical and theoretical insights for heritage-led recovery in rural and post-disaster contexts.
Keywords:
References
Aldrich, D. (2012). Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012896.001.0001.
Camodeca, R., Almici, A., Vannini, M. C. (2022). The economic impact of universal design on cultural heritage contribution to SDGs: Evidence from Italian museums. In: I. Garofolo et al. (Eds.), Transforming our world through universal design for human development. IOS Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Council of Europe. (2005). Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention).
Corsane, G. (2005). Heritage, Museums and Galleries: An Introductory Reader. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203326350.
Cox, R. S., Perry, K. M. (2011). Like a fish out of water: reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. American journal of community psychology, 48(3-4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9427-0.
Giovene di Girasole, E. (2023). The Faro Convention, heritage communities and sustainable development: Towards collaborative approaches for cultural heritage management and enhancement, Sustainability, Special Issue on Communities and Heritage, MDPI AG, Basel.
Galla, A. (1995). Authenticity: rethinking heritage diversity in a pluralistic framework, Nara Convention on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, World Heritage Bureau, UNESCO, Paris, 315-322.
Graham, B., Ashworth, G., Tunbridge, J. (2000). A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. London: Routledge.
Labadi, S. (2013). UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value: Value-Based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5771/9780759122574.
Picard, D., Robinson, M. (2006). Festivals, Tourism and Social Change: Remaking Worlds. Tourism and Cultural Change 8. Channel View Publications, Bristol. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410490 .
Polvani, M., Ciancone, S. (2011). Uno Statuto dei Luoghi per Fontecchio. Esperimento di Democrazia Deliberativa in un Comune terremotato dell’Abruzzo, in Amministrazione in Cammino. Rivista elettronica di diritto pubblico, di diritto amministrativo, di diritto dell’economia e di scienza dell’amministrazione a cura del Centro di ricerca sulle amministrazioni pubbliche “Vittorio Bachelet”, Rome.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
Spadolini, F. (2019). The Faro Convention in Research-Action. Community involvement in a post-disaster heritage revitalization, in Città Come Cultura. Processi di Sviluppo, (a cura di E. Pelosi). Fondazione MAXXI editore, 248–253.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
Waterton, E., Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671.
Article Details
Abstract views: 44

