Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA

Muhammad Khalid Anser; Helmi Ali Mkaouar; Jameel Ahmad Khader; Alaa Shoukry; Wasfi Yengui; Khalid Zaman

doi:10.35784/preko.8539

PDF (angielski)

Opublikowane: 2026-07-01

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.8539

Numer Tom 21 Nr 2 (2026)

Articles

Ocena zbieżności 6 środowiskowych Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w krajach OECD
Idris Yagmur, Sakiru Adebola Solarin , Mustafa Kocaoğlu , Halit Buluthan Çetintaş

1-14
Wzmocnienie pozycji kobiet na rzecz zrównoważonego ożywienia gospodarczego: Optymalizacja rynków zasobów naturalnych dla efektywności środowiskowej w USA
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Helmi Ali Mkaouar, Jameel Ahmad Khader, Alaa Shoukry, Wasfi Yengui, Khalid Zaman

15-40
Rozwój gospodarczy oparty na wiedzy: Strategie integracji transformacji cyfrowej w gospodarkach rozwijających się i rozwiniętych
Xingyuan Sun, Jize Liu

41-53
Kapitał społeczny i jego wpływ na zrównoważony rozwój społeczności oraz zdolności lokalnych władz: studia przypadków z Indii, Brazylii, Polski, Hiszpanii i Szwecji
Lin Ji, Xi Cheng, Savetbek Abdrasulov

54-62
Porównanie polityk zagranicznych Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki i Unii Europejskiej w komunikacji klimatycznej i narracjach narodowych
Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Mykhailo Goncharenko, Svitlana Palii, Dmytro Podolchuk

63-77
Zarządzanie chińskim sektorem energetycznym w procesie przejścia do gospodarki niskoemisyjnej: luki legislacyjne i kształtujące się trendy orzecznicze
Naixin Hu, Qian Wu

78-92
Zrównoważone budżetowanie i finansowanie adaptacji do zmian klimatu: optymalizacja wydatków publicznych w obliczu nasilającego się kryzysu klimatycznego
George Abuselidze

93-104
Etyka eko-feministyczna: zrównoważone podejście do kryzysu ekologicznego
Dipti Khatua, Ajit Kumar Behura, Purnima Lenka

105-114
Sustainable Energy Transition, Energy Efficiency and Labor Market Dynamics: An Empirical Assessment of SDG 7 and SDG 8
Hongxia Zhang, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Uche Benson Okogor, Abdifatah Ahmed Ali Afyare

115-138
Zmniejszanie czy narastanie nierówności? Krytyczna analiza płci i zrównoważoności poprzez problematyzację polityki cyfrowej w Indiach
Sanjana Santra, Kishore Kumar, Nilanjan Chattopadhyay

139-151
Ceny emisji dwutlenku węgla, zielone inwestycje i jakość pracy w ośmiu wiodących globalnych gospodarkach przechodzących transformację energetyczną: implikacje dla zatrudnienia, zdrowia i Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju (SDGs)
Hongyun Kuang, Qian Xiao, Ye Wu

152-167
Zielone miejsca pracy w transformacji energetycznej wśród ośmiu największych gospodarek: ocena jakości zatrudnienia w łańcuchach dostaw energii odnawialnej
Jianhua Zheng

168-185
Badanie dynamicznych ścieżek efektywności innowacji w zakresie technologii ekologicznych w regionach prowincjonalnych w Chinach
Juan Tan, Jinyu Wei

186-198
Zielone finanse i ludzkie zdrowie: rola publicznych inwestycji w energię odnawialną w Chinach, Indiach i wybranych innych gospodarkach
Dechun Wang, Hao Ding

199-223
Zrównoważony rozwój w kontekście zmian klimatycznych w Azji Południowo-Wschodniej: systematyczny przegląd literatury
Dewi Risnawati, Sry Reski Mulka, Dea Rizki Amanda

224-238
Harmonizacja godności człowieka i rozwoju ekonomicznego: ewolucja praw pracowniczych w globalnej architekturze zrównoważonego rozwoju
Yuriy Kyrylov, Nataliia Cherevko

239-247
Maṣlaḥah Mursalah i zrównoważony rozwój środowiska: perspektywa jurysprudencji islamskiej
Anthony Le Duc

248-257
Zielona odbudowa, gospodarka niskoemisyjna i zrównoważony rozwój w gospodarkach BRICS
Xiaoning Sun, Sha Fu

258-283
Skuteczne zarządzanie destynacjami turystycznymi w celu minimalizacji negatywnego wpływu na środowisko i dziedzictwo kulturowe
Zegeng Сhen, Shimin Fu

284-297
Spójność rozwoju społecznego i zrównoważonego: podejście oparte na metodologii DP2
Oksana Liashenko, Olena Mykhailovska, Anastasiia Duka, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi

298-326
Alternatywna dywersyfikacja aktywów dla inwestycji ESG: dowody z krajów G7 w obliczu kryzysów gospodarczych i geopolitycznych
Halilibrahim Gökgöz, Aamir Aijaz Syed, Fadhila Hamza, Ahmed Jeribi
Sztuczna inteligencja w globalnych bibliotekach: ścieżki i polityki zrównoważonego rozwoju
Shuang Zheng, Qianbai Dai , Rabiu Abubakar

347-360
Włączenie finansowe, dostęp do energii i redukcja ubóstwa w gospodarkach BRICS Plus
Xiaowan Xu

361-392
Resilencja jako kluczowa cecha inteligentnych miast wspierających zrównoważony rozwój obszarów miejskich
Magdalena Kisała

393-402

Archiwum

2026

Tom 21 Nr 2
2026-07-01 24
Tom 21 Nr 1
2026-01-10 21

2025

Tom 20 Nr 2
2025-07-10 19
Tom 20 Nr 1
2025-01-10 22

2024

Tom 19 Nr 2
2024-07-01 24
Tom 19 Nr 1
2024-01-08 27

2023

Tom 18 Nr 2
2023-07-10 25
Tom 18 Nr 1
2023-01-01 25

2022

Tom 17 Nr 2
2022-07-04 26
Tom 17 Nr 1
2022-01-03 28

Authors

Muhammad Khalid Anser

mkhald77@xaiu.edu.cn

Xi'an International University

Helmi Ali Mkaouar

hmkauar@ksu.edu.sa

King Saud University

Jameel Ahmad Khader

Jkhder@ksu.edu.sa

King Saud University

Alaa Shoukry

abdulhamid@ksu.edu.sa

King Saud University

Wasfi Yengui

wyengui@ksu.edu.sa

King Saud University

Khalid Zaman

khalid_zaman786@yahoo.com

The University of Haripur

Abstrakt

5 Cel Zrównoważonego Rozwoju (SDG) promuje równość płci i wzmocnienie pozycji kobiet i dziewcząt. Pomimo skupienia się na SDG 5 (Równość płci), w artykule pokazujemy, że wzmocnienie pozycji kobiet wspiera wiele innych SDG. Promowanie inkluzywnych działań poprzez równość płci wzmacnia SDG 8 (Godna Praca i Wzrost Gospodarczy) poprzez zwiększoną produktywność i innowacyjność, SDG 9 (Przemysł, Innowacje i Infrastruktura) poprzez zwiększoną reprezentację kobiet w nauce i technologii, SDG 12 (Odpowiedzialna Konsumpcja i Produkcja) poprzez bardziej zrównoważone wybory behawioralne oraz SDG 13 (Działania na rzecz Klimatu) poprzez świadomość ekologiczną i działania rzecznicze. Wzmocnienie pozycji kobiet jest systemowym motorem zrównoważonego rozwoju społecznego, gospodarczego i środowiskowego. Brak parytetu płci w zarządzaniu jest kontrproduktywny dla celów długoterminowych. Opierając się na kluczowych danych, badanie wypełniło lukę naukową, uwzględniając różne predyktory autonomii kobiet, które pomagają w zarządzaniu zasobami środowiskowymi i naturalnymi kraju w Stanach Zjednoczonych, w latach 1975–2023. Asymetryczny związek między czynnikami autonomii kobiet, śladem ekologicznym i eksportem rud i metali został wykazany za pomocą nieliniowego modelu autoregresyjnego rozłożonego opóźnienia (NARDL). Ponadto test przyczynowości Grangera jest używany do wnioskowania przyczynowego między zmiennymi. Szacunki NARDL pokazują, że zwiększenie wskaźnika suwerenności kobiet jest korzystne w krótkim i długim okresie dla zmniejszenia śladu ekologicznego i ochrony eksportu rud i metali. Ponadto pozytywne i negatywne wstrząsy zaawansowanej edukacji kobiet zmniejszają ślad środowiskowy poprzez mądrość polityczną. Szacunki przyczynowości Grangera pokazują, że ślad ekologiczny powoduje zwiększenie zaawansowanej edukacji kobiet, podczas gdy zaawansowana edukacja kobiet wspiera suwerenność kobiet. Badanie potwierdziło wykonalność asymetrycznej przyczynowości między wymienionymi zmiennymi w określonym okresie. Wykazujemy że Kraj musi uwzględnić kobiety w swoich głównych planach politycznych w celu ochrony środowiska i zasobów naturalnych na rzecz zielonego i czystego rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe:

autonomia kobiet, ślad ekologiczny, napływające bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne FDI, PKB na mieszkańca, NARDL

Cele Zrównoważonego Rozwoju (SDG)

Równość płci
Odpowiedzialna konsumpcja i produkcja
Działania w dziedzinie klimatu

Bibliografia

1. ADENDORFF C.M., KEOWN H., AMANSURE R., 2020, The development of a socio-economic model to promote women's empowerment initiatives in the renewable energy sector of South Africa, Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 31(2): 34–47.

2. AGARWAL S., LENKA U., SINGH K., AGRAWAL V., AGRAWAL A.M., 2020, A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases, Journal of Cleaner Production, 274: 123135.

3. AHMAD N., ULLAH Z., ARSHAD M.Z., KAMRAN H., SCHOLZ M., HAN H., 2021a, Relationship between cor-porate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 1138–1148.

4. AHMAD N., ULLAH Z., MAHMOOD A., ARIZA-MONTES A., VEGA-MUÑOZ A., HAN H., SCHOLZ M., 2021b, Corporate social responsibility at the micro-level as a ‘new organizational value’ for sustainability: are fe-males more aligned towards it?, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4): 2165, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165.

5. AHMED Z., AHMAD M., RJIOUB H., KALUGINA O.A., HUSSAIN N., 2022, Economic growth, renewable ener-gy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sus-tainable development, Sustainable Development, 30(4): 595–605.

6. AKINSEMOLU A.A., OLUKOYA O.A., 2020, The vulnerability of women to climate change in coastal regions of Nigeria: A case of the Ilaje community in Ondo State, Journal of Cleaner Production, 246: 119015.

7. ANANTHA K.H., GARG K.K., MOSES D.S., PATIL M.D., SAWARGAONKAR G.L., KAMDI P.J., WANI S.P., 2021, Impact of natural resource management interventions on water resources and environmental services in dif-ferent agroecological regions of India, Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 13: 100574.

8. ARTHUR-HOLMES F., BUSIA K.A., 2020, Household dynamics and the bargaining power of women in artisanal and small-scale mining in sub-Saharan Africa: A Ghanaian case study, Resources Policy, 69: 101884.

9. ATAHAU A.D.R., SAKTI I.M., HURUTA A.D., KIM M.S., 2021, Gender and renewable energy integration: The mediating role of green-microfinance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128536.

10. BEGAM A., MUJAHID N., 2019, The nexus between economic globalization and female labor force participation, Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 19: 19–40.

11. BELL S.E., DAGGETT C., LABUSKI C., 2020, Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough, Energy Research & Social Science, 68: 101557.

12. BERNIELL I., GASPARINI L., MARCHIONNI M., VIOLLAZ M., 2023, Lucky women in unlucky cohorts: Gender differences in the effects of initial labor market conditions in Latin America, Journal of Development Economics, 161: 103042.

13. BHALOTRA S., VENKATARAMANI A., WALTHER S., 2023, Women’s fertility and labor market responses to a health innovation, Journal of the European Economic Association, 35(2): 461–479.

14. BILGILI F., KHAN M., AWAN A., 2023b, Is there a gender dimension of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evi-dence from Asian countries, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3): 2387–2418.

15. BILGILI F., SOYKAN E., DUMRUL C., AWAN A., ÖNDEROL S., KHAN K., 2023a, Disaggregating the impact of natural resource rents on environmental sustainability in the MENA region: A quantile regression analysis, Re-sources Policy, 85: 103825.

16. BORMANN K.C., BACKS S., HOON C., 2021, What makes nonfamily employees act as good stewards? Emotions and the moderating roles of stewardship culture and gender roles in family firms, Family Business Review, 34(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520968826.

17. BROWN-GROSSMAN F., NAVA-BOLAÑOS I., 2023, Do male and female labor market transition patterns differ in Mexico?, The Economics of Women and Work in the Global Economy, Routledge: 191–222.

18. BUCKINGHAM S., PERELLO M., LÓPEZ-MURCIA J., 2021, Gender mainstreaming urban waste reduction in European cities, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(4): 671–688.

19. BURKHARDT K., NGUYEN P., POINCELOT E., 2020, Agents of change: Women in top management and corpo-rate environmental performance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4): 1591–1604.

20. CAMERON E.C., CUNNINGHAM F.J., HEMINGWAY S.L., TSCHIDA S.L., JACQUIN K.M., 2020, Indicators of gender inequality and violence against women predict number of reported human trafficking legal cases across countries, Journal of Human Trafficking, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1852000.

21. CAMPBELL S.J., MEDIANTI E., ADE YULIANI R.J., SETIAWAN H., DE LA ROSA E., SUHERFIAN W., 2021, Gender-inclusive financial literacy strategies: Unlocking the value of small-scale fishing communities, SPC Women in Fisheries Information Bulletin, 33: 37–47.

22. CHAN E.S., 2021, Influencing stakeholders to reduce carbon footprints: Hotel managers’ perspective, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94: 102807.

23. CHANG C.C., LIAO Y.T., CHANG Y.W., 2019, Life cycle assessment of carbon footprint in public transporta-tion—a case study of bus route no. 2 in Tainan city, Taiwan, Procedia Manufacturing, 30: 388–395.

24. CHÁVEZ A., RODRÍGUEZ-PUELLO G., 2022, Commodity price shocks and the gender wage gap: Evidence from the metal mining prices super-cycle in Chile, Resources Policy, 76: 102497.

25. COE I.R., WILEY R., BEKKER L.G., 2019, Organisational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine, The Lancet, 393(10171), 587–593.

26. CRONKLETON P., EVANS K., ADDAOH T., SMITH DUMONT E., ZIDA M., DJOUDI H., 2021, Using participa-tory approaches to enhance women’s engagement in natural resource management in northern Ghana, Sustainabil-ity, 13(13): 7072, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137072.

27. DOĞAN N., KIRIKKALELI D., 2021, Does gender equality in education matter for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 39853–39865.

28. DU C., ANSER M.K., PENG M.Y.P., ASKAR S.E., NASSANI A.A., ZAMAN K., ABRO M.M.Q., 2021, Women’s autonomy and its impact on environmental sustainability agenda, Journal of Environmental Planning and Man-agement, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1952168.

29. DURÁN-DÍAZ P., ARMENTA-RAMÍREZ A., KURJENOJA A.K., SCHUMACHER M., 2020, Community devel-opment through the empowerment of indigenous women in Cuetzalan del Progreso, Mexico, Land, 9(5): 163, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050163.

30. ELSHEIKH T., ALMAQTARI F.A., AL-HATTAMI H.M., AL-BUKHRANI M.A., ETTISH A.A., 2024, The moder-ating effect of women in boardrooms on the relationship between control of corruption and corporate sustainability performance, Discover Sustainability, 5(1): 502.

31. ERGAS C., GREINER P.T., MCGEE J.A., CLEMENT M.T., 2021, Does gender climate influence climate change? The multidimensionality of gender equality and its countervailing effects on the carbon intensity of well-being, Sus-tainability, 13(7), 3956, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073956.

32. ESHUN M.E., 2020, Women, artisanal mining and peacebuilding in Africa, Women and Peacebuilding in Africa, Routledge: 158–172.

33. FAN P., QIAN X., WANG J., 2023, Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77: 101931.

34. FRIMAN H., BANNER I., SITBON Y., SAHAR-INBAR L., SHAKED N., 2024, Nurturing eco-literate minds: Un-veiling the pathways to minimize ecological footprint in early childhood education, Social Sciences, 13(4): 187.

35. FRISCHTAK C.R., 2019, The protection of intellectual property rights and industrial technology development in Brazil, Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology, and Economic Performance, Routledge: 61–98.

36. GANDA F., 2019, The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM ap-proach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7): 6758–6772.

37. GATTO A., DRAGO C., 2021, When renewable energy, empowerment, and entrepreneurship connect: Measuring energy policy effectiveness in 230 countries, Energy Research & Social Science, 78: 101977.

38. GAYATHRI R., VIJAYABANU C., 2021, Upshot of gender inequalities towards labor markets: A macro level perspective, Women Empowerment and Well-Being for Inclusive Economic Growth, IGI Global: 73–88.

39. GLAZEBROOK T., NOLL S., OPOKU E., 2020, Gender matters: Climate change, gender bias, and women’s farm-ing in the global South and North, Agriculture, 10(7): 267, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070267.

40. GOEL M., RAVISHANKAR N., 2021, Impact of public policy and legislation on autonomy and empowerment of women in India, Gender Issues, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09282-7.

41. GRAAFLAND J., 2020, Women in management and sustainable development of SMEs: Do relational environmen-tal management instruments matter?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5): 2320–2328.

42. HOMEWOOD K., NIELSEN M.R., KEANE A., 2020, Women, wellbeing and wildlife management areas in Tanza-nia, The Journal of Peasant Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1726323.

43. HOSIO Y.F., AQUARISTA A., 2023, Ecological impact of mangrove forest damage on women's economic re-sources based on ecofeminism theory in Youtefa Bay, Jayapura City, JAMBU AIR Journal of Accounting Manage-ment Business and International Research, 1(2): 86–97.

44. HOU X., HU Q., LIANG X., XU J., 2023, How do low-carbon city pilots affect carbon emissions? Staggered differ-ence-in-difference evidence from Chinese firms, Economic Analysis and Policy, 79: 664–686.

45. HUANG C., LIU W., IQBAL W., SHAH S.A.R., 2024, Does digital governance matter for environmental sustaina-bility? The key challenges and opportunities under the prism of natural resource management, Resources Policy, 91: 104812.

46. IBRAHIEM D.M., HANAFY S.A., 2020, Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy con-sumption and globalization: an empirical analysis, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Jour-nal, 31(6): 1549–1568.

47. IPCC, 2014, IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5/ (22.02.2023).

48. JAISWAL N., GUPTA A.K., SINGH S., SRIVASTAVA R., 2023, Women as an edifice of nation-building: A futur-istic approach, Biodiversity, CRC Press: 447–454.

49. JAYACHANDRAN S., 2021, Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries, IMF Eco-nomic Review, 69(3): 576–595.

50. JEONG B.G., COMPION S., 2021, Characteristics of women’s leadership in African social enterprises: The Heart-felt Project, Bright Kids Uganda and Chikumbuso, Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-11-2019-0305.

51. KAGGWA M., 2020, Interventions to promote gender equality in the mining sector of South Africa, The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(2): 398–404.

52. KAKADE K.S., KULKARNI A.M., NAIK K.R., 2024, The role of women leadership in environmental manage-ment, Opportunities and Challenges for Women Leaders in Environmental Management, EDS. Aquino P. Jr., Jala-gat R. Jr., Justin M., IGI Global: 31–49, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5986-7.ch003.

53. KANSAKE B.A., SAKYI-ADDO G.B., DUMAKOR-DUPEY N.K., 2021, Creating a gender-inclusive mining in-dustry: Uncovering the challenges of female mining stakeholders, Resources Policy, 70: 101962.

54. KHURSHEED A., KHAN A.A., MUSTAFA F., 2021, Women’s social empowerment and microfinance: a brief review of literature, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(5): 249–265.

55. KUŞKAYA S., BILGILI F., MUĞALOĞLU E., KHAN K., HOQUE M.E., TOGUÇ N., 2023, The role of solar ener-gy usage in environmental sustainability: Fresh evidence through time-frequency analyses, Renewable Energy, 206: 858–871.

56. LI T.M., 2007, The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics, Duke University Press.

57. LIU Y., ANSER M.K., ZAMAN K., 2021, Ecofeminism and natural resource management: Justice delayed, justice denied, Sustainability, 13(13): 7319, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137319.

58. LÖW C., 2020, Gender and indigenous concepts of climate protection: A critical revision of REDD+ projects, Cur-rent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43: 91–98.

59. MA H., NING W., WANG J., WANG S., 2024, The impact of environmental pollution liability insurance on firms’ green innovations: evidence from China, Applied Economics Letters, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331658.

60. MAJA M.M., AYANO S.F., 2021, The impact of population growth on natural resources and farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries, Earth Systems and Environment, 5: 271–283.

61. MALEKNIA R., SALEHI T., 2024, Exploring the drivers behind women’s intentions towards climate change miti-gation through urban forest conservation, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 97: 128395.

62. MALEKNIA R., ENESCU E.R., SALEHI T., 2025, Climate change and urban forests: generational differences in women’s perceptions and willingness to participate in conservation efforts, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7: 1450098.

63. MANGAROO-PILLAY S., BOTHA D., 2020, An exploration of women's workplace experiences in the South Afri-can mining industry, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 120(8): 475–483.

64. MANG-BENZA C., JODOIN L., DOUBOGAN Y.O., GAYE I., KOLA E., 2023, Making energy justice work for women in rural sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo, Energy Policy, 173, 113345.

65. MEAGHER K., SINGH N.S., PATEL P., 2020, The role of gender inclusive leadership during the COVID-19 pan-demic to support vulnerable populations in conflict settings, BMJ Global Health, 5(9): e003760.

66. MITRA A., BARUA P., 2022, Coping practices of women fisherfolk in responses to climate change at UNESCO declared world heritage site of Sundarbans, Ecological Footprints of Climate Change, eds. Chatterjee U., Akanwa A.O., Kumar S., Singh S.K., Dutta Roy A., Springer Climate, Springer, Cham: 191–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15501-7_28.

67. MUJEED S., LI S., JABEEN M., NASSANI A.A., ASKAR S.E., ZAMAN K., JAMBARI H., 2021, Technowomen: Women’s autonomy and its impact on environmental quality, Sustainability, 13(4): 1611, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041611.

68. MUNGALL-BALDWIN C., 2022, Women’s participation in the prevention and control of dengue using environ-mental methods in the global south: a qualitative meta-synthesis, International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1): 1–23.

69. MURTAZA S.A., MAHMOOD A., SALEEM S., AHMAD N., SHARIF M.S., MOLNÁR E., 2021, Proposing stew-ardship theory as an alternate to explain the relationship between CSR and employees’ pro-environmental behavior, Sustainability, 13(15): 8558, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158558.

70. NASSANI A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ZAMAN K., 2021, Ecological footprints jeopardy for mineral resource extrac-tion: efficient use of energy, financial development and insurance services to conserve natural resources, Resources Policy, 74: 102271.

71. NASSANI A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ABRO M.M.Q., ISLAM T., ZAMAN K., 2019, The impact of tourism and finance on women empowerment, Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(2): 234–254.

72. NHAMO G., MUKONZA C., 2020, Opportunities for women in the green economy and environmental sectors, Sustainable Development, 28(4): 823–832.

73. NYAHUNDA L., 2021, Social work empowerment model for mainstreaming the participation of rural women in the climate change discourse, Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6: 120–129.

74. ODERA J.A., MULUSA J., 2020, SDGs, gender equality and women’s empowerment: what prospects for delivery, in Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights: 95–106, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/22942/1007219.pdf .

75. ODO D.B., YANG I.A., GREEN D., KNIBBS L.D., 2021, Women’s empowerment and household fuel use in 31 African countries: a cross-sectional analysis, Environmental Research Letters, 16(2): 025012.

76. OKERE K.I., DIMNWOI S.K., EKESIOBI C., ONUOHA F.C., 2024, Pollution, governance, and women's work: examining African female labour force participation in environmental pollution and governance quality puzzles, Women’s Studies International Forum: 102, 102851.

77. OLUJOBI O.J., UFUA D.E., OKORIE U.E., OGBARI M.E., 2022, Carbon emission, solid waste management, and electricity generation: A legal and empirical perspective for renewable energy in Nigeria, International Environmen-tal Agreements, 22(3): 599–619.

78. ORATUNGYE K.E., RUBYOGO J.C., ONYANGO P., 2021, Improving food security, nutrition, incomes, natural resource base and gender equity for better livelihoods of smallholder households in sub-Saharan Africa, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/113988.

79. OYAWOLE F.P., SHITTU A., KEHINDE M., OGUNNAIKE G., AKINJOBI L.T., 2020, Women empowerment and adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices in Nigeria, African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 12(1): 105–119.

80. PAN Y., ZHANG C., LEE C., LV S., 2024, Environmental performance evaluation of electric enterprises during a power crisis: Evidence from DEA methods and AI prediction algorithms, Energy Economics, 130: 107285.

81. PANDEY D., AGRAWAL M., PANDEY J.S., 2011, Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation, Environmen-tal Monitoring and Assessment, 178: 135–160.

82. PATA U.K., 2021, Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break, Environmental Science and Pol-lution Research, 28: 846–861.

83. PESARAN M.H., SHIN Y., SMITH R.J., 2001, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3): 289–326.

84. PETTORELLI N., GRAHAM N.A., SEDDON N., BUSTAMANTE M.M., LOWTON M.J., SUTHERLAND W.J., BARLOW J., 2021, Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas, Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(11): 2384–2393.

85. PIENAACH C.K., BARUAH B., KANSANGA M., LUGINA AH I., 2024, The impact of community-led conserva-tion models on women's nature-based livelihood outcomes in semi-arid Northern Ghana, Discover Environment, 2(1): 45.

86. POTLURI S., PHANI B.V., 2020, Women and green entrepreneurship: a literature-based study of India, Interna-tional Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(3): 409–428.

87. RAIHAN A., TUSPEKOVA A., 2022, Dynamic impacts of economic growth, renewable energy use, urbanization, industrialization, tourism, agriculture, and forests on carbon emissions in Turkey, Carbon Research, 1(1): 20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-022-00019-z.

88. ROBA R., KIKWATHA R.W., 2021, Influence of women participation on sustainability of community conservation project implemented by Jaldesa Community Conservancy in Marsabit County, Kenya, European Journal of Busi-ness and Management Research, 6(3), 188–194.

89. ROTHERMEL A.K., 2020, Gender in the United Nations’ agenda on preventing and countering violent extremism, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(5): 720–741.

90. RUI G.U., NIE F.Y., 2021, Does empowering women benefit poverty reduction? Evidence from a multi-component program in Inner Mongolia, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 1092–1106.

91. SADIQ M., WEN F., 2022, Environmental footprint impacts of nuclear energy consumption, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(10): 3672–3681.

92. SAIT S., 2021, The land rights, climate justice and gender equality conundrum, African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 4(2): 267–291.

93. SALAMON H., 2023, The effect of women's parliamentary participation on renewable energy policy outcomes, European Journal of Political Research, 62(1): 174–196.

94. SEN A., 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

95. SEN A., 2001, Gender equity and the population problem, International Journal of Health Services, 31(3): 469–474.

96. SEN G., 2019, Gender equality and women's empowerment: feminist mobilization for the SDGs, Global Policy, 10: 28–38.

97. SHAHZAD U., FERRAZ D., NGUYEN H.H., CUI L., 2022, Spillovers between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174: 121205.

98. SHIN Y., YU B., GREENWOOD-NIMMO M., 2014, Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework, Festscrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer,:281–314.

99. SHRESTHA B., TIWARI S., BAJRACHARYA S., 2021, Role of gender participation in urban household energy technology, Discover Sustainability, 2(1): 1–18.

100. SHRESTHA G., PAKHTIGIAN E.L., JEULAND M., 2023, Women who do not migrate: intersectionality and social relations in Western Nepal, World Development, 161: 106109.

101. SINGH N.C., 2022, Sustainable natural resource management through traditional ecological knowledge, Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Resource Management in Asia, Springer: 223–240.

102. SINGH P., TABE T., MARTIN T., 2022, The role of women in community resilience to climate change, Women’s Studies International Forum, 90: 102550.

103. SITHOLE M., PHIRI K., MASABO T., 2021, Gendered spaces in natural resource utilisation, Cogent Social Scienc-es, 7(1): 1909792.

104. SSERWANJA Q., NABBUYE R., KAWUKI J., 2022, Women empowerment and antenatal care in Uganda, Interna-tional Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(3): 1736–1753.

105. STOJANOVSKA-STEFANOVA A., MAGDINCEVA-SOPOVA M., RUNCHEVA-TASEV H., 2020, Empowerment of women: challenges and opportunities, International Scientific Conference Proceedings: 119–130.

106. THOMSON L., KAMALALDIN A., SJÖDIN D., PARIDA V., 2021, Maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00717-3.

107. UNITED NATIONS, 2021, Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.

108. USMAN M., MAKHDUM M.S.A., KOUSAR R., 2021, Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy affect ecological footprint?, Sustainable Cities and Society, 65: 102590.

109. WANG Q., WANG J., GAO F., 2021, Economic and environmental factors and health insurance purchase, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58: 101479.

110. WIECZOREK-SZYMAŃSKA A., 2020, Gender diversity in academic sector, Administrative Sciences, 10(3): 41, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030041.

111. WORLD BANK, 2023, World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.

112. WU A., 2024, Do female political leaders make the environment greener? Evidence from the United States, Kyber-netes, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1932.

113. WU Q., LI Y., WU Y., LI F., ZHONG S., 2022, Spatial spillover effect of environmental regulation on total factor productivity, Scientific Reports, 12: 1–27.

114. YANG X., GAO C., 2021, Missing women in STEM in China, Research in Science Education, 51: 1705–1723.

115. YORO K.O., DARAMOLA M.O., 2020, CO2 emission sources and global warming effect, in Advances in Carbon Capture, Woodhead Publishing, 3–28.

116. YURUI L., XUANCHANG Z., ZHI C., ZHENGJIA L., ZHI L., YANSUI L., 2021, Ecological restoration and eco-nomic development in China’s Loess Plateau, Science of the Total Environment, 756: 143676.

117. ZIERSCH A., MILLER E., WALSH M., DUE C., CALLAGHAN P., HOWE J., GREEN E., 2023, Health impacts of employment experiences for women refugees in Australia, SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 3: 100209.

Wzmocnienie pozycji kobiet na rzecz zrównoważonego ożywienia gospodarczego: Optymalizacja rynków zasobów naturalnych dla efektywności środowiskowej w USA. (2026). Problemy Ekorozwoju , 21(2), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.8539

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Numer Tom 21 Nr 2 (2026)

Archiwum

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Authors

Abstrakt

Słowa kluczowe:

Cele Zrównoważonego Rozwoju (SDG)

Bibliografia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Licencja