Noise source analysis of the nitrogen generation system
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025)
-
Taming complexity: Generative doppelgangers for stochastic data trends in complex industrial manufacturing systems
Richard NASSO TOUMBA, Maxime MOAMISSOAL SAMUEL, Achille EBOKE, Boniface ONDO, Timothée KOMBE1-22
-
Kidney disease diagnosis based on artificial intelligence/deep learning techniques
Abeer ALSHIHA, Abdalrahman QUBAA23-37
-
Pulmonary diseases identification: Deep learning models and ensemble learning
Patrycja KWAŚNIEWSKA, Grzegorz ZIELIŃSKI, Paweł POWROŹNIK, Maria SKUBLEWSKA-PASZKOWSKA38-58
-
A machine learning approach for evaluating drop impact reliability of solder joints in BGA packaging
Venkata Naga Chandana YANAMURTHY, Venu Kumar NATHI59-71
-
Prediction of remaining useful life and downtime of induction motors with supervised machine learning
Muhammad Dzulfiqar ANINDHITO, SUHARJITO72-86
-
An ensemble model for maternal health risk classification in Delta State, Nigeria
Oghenevabaire EFEVBERHA-OGODO, Francisca A. EGBOKHARE, Fidelis O. CHETE87-98
-
Transforming ERP interfaces in production environments: An empirical evaluation using the User Experience Questionnaire
Anna HAMERA99-116
-
Systematic drift characterization in differential wheeled robot using external VR tracking: Effects of route complexity and motion dynamics
Stanisław Piotr SKULIMOWSKI, Szymon RYBKA, Bartosz TATARA, Michał Dawid WELMAN117-136
-
Wireless body area networks: A review of challenges, architecture, applications, technologies and interference mitigation for next-generation healthcare
Akeel Abdulraheem THULNOON, Ahmed Mahdi JUBAIR, Foad Salem MUBAREK, Senan Ali ABD137-161
-
Fuzzy logic in arrhythmia detection: A systematic review of techniques, applications, and clinical interpretability
Nadjem Eddine MENACEUR, Sofia KOUAH, Derdour MEKHLOUF, Khaled OUANES, Meryam AMMI162-181
-
Enhancing interpretability in brain tumor detection: Leveraging Grad-CAM and SHAP for explainable AI in MRI-based cancer diagnosis
Nasr GHARAIBEH182-197
-
Noise source analysis of the nitrogen generation system
Grzegorz BARAŃSKI198-209
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 3
2025-10-05 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2025-06-27 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2025-03-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 4
2025-01-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-09-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-08-14 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-03-30 12
-
Vol. 19 No. 4
2023-12-31 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 3
2023-09-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-06-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-03-31 10
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-09-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-06-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-03-30 7
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-06-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-03-30 8
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive noise source analysis of a nitrogen generation system installed at an industrial production facility. The primary goal of the investigation was to determine the location of the dominant noise sources, as well as to identify their respective sound pressure levels and frequency characteristics under operational conditions. Detailed measurements were conducted using a 16-microphone array combined with the CAE Noise Inspector software for accurate sound field visualisation and analysis. Experimental tests were carried out at three distinct locations within the system: the nitrogen generation installation (location 1), the nitrogen storage tank (location 2), and the ejection tube for exhaust gases (location 3), with the latter further subdivided into three specific measurement points (3a, 3b, 3c) to account for variations along the tube length. Each acoustic measurement session lasted three seconds, with data captured at a high recording frequency of 204,800 Hz to ensure precise resolution across the frequency spectrum. The operational cycle of the nitrogen generator was divided into two main phases: phase 1, characterised by the transient sounds associated with valve actuation, and phase 2, dominated by the continuous noise generated during nitrogen transfer to storage tanks and exhaust gas expulsion. Recordings taken at location 1 captured both operational phases, while measurements at locations 2 and 3 were focused exclusively on phase 2 to isolate relevant noise sources. The results provide a detailed and quantitative characterisation of the acoustic emissions associated with the nitrogen generation process, offering valuable insights that can inform the development of targeted noise reduction strategies and contribute to the future optimisation of the system’s mechanical design and operational efficiency.
Keywords:
References
Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F., Costarelli, D., D’Alessandro, F., Scrucca, F., Seracini, M., & Vinti, G. (2021). Innovative techniques for the improvement of industrial noise sources identification by beamforming. Noise Mapping, 8(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2021-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2021-0010
Banas, A., & Wilde, K. (2014). Vibration diagnostics of footbridge with use of rotation sensor. Applied Computer Science, 10(4), 38–49.
Bocanegra, J.A., Borelli, D., Gaggero, T., Rizzuto, E., & Schenone, C. (2022). A novel approach to port noise characterisation using an acoustic camera. Science of the Total Environment, 808, 151903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151903
Bortnowski, P., Nowak-Szpak, A., Ozdoba, M., & Krol, R. (2020). The acoustic camera as a tool to identify belt conveyor noises.
Caban, J., Litak, G., Ambrożkiewicz, B., Gardyński, L., Stączek, P., & Wolszczak, P. (2020). Impact-based piezoelectric energy harvesting system excited from diesel engine suspension. Applied Computer Science, 16(3), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2020-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2020-18
Ershov, V. V., Sorokin, E. V., Palchikovskiy V. V., & Korin, I.A. (2020). Study of new beam microphone array operation based on aerodynamic noise sources localization. 2020 International Conference on Dynamics and Vibroacoustics of Machines (DVM) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DVM49764.2020.9243905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DVM49764.2020.9243905
Fiebig, W. (2007). Location of noise sources in fluid power machines. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 13(4), 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2007.11105102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2007.11105102
Fiebig, W. (2019). Use of acoustic camera for noise sources localization and noise reduction in the industrial plant. Archives of Acoustics, 45(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2020.132487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2020.132487
Fredianelli, L., Bolognese, M., Fidecaro, F., & Licitra, G. (2021). Classification of noise sources for port area noise mapping. Environments, 8(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8020012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8020012
Jonak, K., & Krukow, P. (2017). Matching pursuit algorithm in assessing the state of rolling bearings. Applied Computer Science, 13(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2017-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2017-14
Journal of Sustainable Mining, 19(4), 7. https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1036
Li, L., Feng, Z., & Zhao, L. (2013). Recognition of noise source on tandem vibratory roller. Advanced Materials Research, 694-697, 439-443. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.439
Licitra, G., Bolognese, M., Chiari, C., Carpita, S., & Fredianelli, L. (2022). Noise source predominance map: A new representation for strategic noise maps. Noise Mapping. 9(1), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2022-0163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2022-0163
Magryta, P., Skiba, K., & Czyż, Z. (2017). Identification of noise generated by driving set of autogyro using an acoustic camera. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 11(4), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/80825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/80825
Nashimoto, A., Fujisawa, N., Nakano, T., & Yoda, T. (2008). Visualization of aerodynamic noise source around a rotating fan blade. Journal of Visualization, 11(4), 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182205
Pavlikova, L., Hricová, B., & Lumnitzer, E. (2018). Acoustic camera as a tool for identifying machinery and equipment failures. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 12(1), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/87110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/87110
Terra Universal. (n.d.). NGP300+ Technical specification. https://www.terrauniversal.com/ngp300-on-site-psa-nitrogen-generator-atlas-copco.html
Wibroakustyka. (n.d.). Acoustic camera noise Inspector for quick location of noise sources. www.wibroakustyka.com.pl
Zamponi. R., Rubio Carpio, A., Avallone. F., & Ragni, D. (2025). Noise source analysis of porous fairings in a scaled landing gear model. Aerospace Science and Technology, 158, 109885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109885
Zhang, C., & Wei, L. (2018). Experiment on noise source identification based on acoustic array. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 208, 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012071
Article Details
Abstract views: 109
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
