Progress in the Field of Sustainable Development as a Result of Implementing the Potential of Social Cohesion: Regional Context
Daria Mykhailenko
d.g.mykhailenko@ukr.netV.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Department Marketing, Management and Entrepreneurship, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8420-6510
Olena Havrylchenko
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-2938
Lidiia Bezkorovaina
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-0626
Nataliia Gliebova
National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-3867
Viktoriia Kovalova
National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-6971
Abstract
The study examines the role of social cohesion in the context of sustainable development of regional societies. It is proved that progress in the field of sustainable development depends on social cohesion as one of the factors ensuring the achievement of environmental, economic and social changes. A mechanism of social cohesion has been developed, the result of which, along with social stability and justice, strengthening citizens' trust in state and public institutions, social welfare, is a request for sustainable development of regions. The article proves that modern challenges, such as social inequality, migration and ethnic differences, can weaken the potential of social cohesion as a catalyst for sustainable development of regions.
To quantify the level of social cohesion, a system of indicators is proposed that integrates economic, demographic, educational and other indicators, and allows for a detailed analysis of the current state of social cohesion in various regions. Taking into account the impact of social cohesion indicators on the progress of sustainable development of regions is realised through the inclusion of indicators that reflect the level of social cohesion potential and, at the same time, are a source of data for assessing the achievement of sustainable development goals.
Using the example of the EU countries, the analysis of indicators related to the blocks of trust in institutions and economic indicators in assessing the level of social cohesion was carried out. The estimated indicators are also taken into account when calculating the achievement of the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS): SDG 1, SDG 8, SDG 10, SDG 16. The proposed approach makes it possible to take into account the indicators that are most vulnerable in terms of their impact on the progress of regions in the field of sustainable development, as well as to form a list of measures, the implementation of which will ensure capacity building of the social cohesion mechanism (hereinafter referred to as SCM).
The main innovative contribution of the study is the development of an economic and mathematical model for optimizing resources and prioritizing measures aimed at strengthening social cohesion. The model takes into account the amount of available resources, the need to use them for the implementation of specific activities and an expert assessment of their priority. This approach provides an objective and systematic solution to the challenges of sustainable development, focusing on social cohesion as a key factor. The study proves that the application of the model requires high-quality data, competence in the process of interpreting modelling results and active interaction with stakeholders. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the integration of social cohesion into strategic planning and the application of the proposed model are the basis for more effective and sustainable development of regional society.
Keywords:
social cohesion, social justice, sustainable development of regions, consideration of social regional justice, potential of social cohesion, modellingReferences
BARANOVA V., KULINICH T., DUTCHAK O., ZVONAR V., DENYSHCHENKO L., 2021, Development of corpo-rate social responsibility in business as a factor of fiscal decentralization, Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 8(3): 411-424, https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.760.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.760
Google Scholar
DANG H. A. H., SERAJUDDIN U., 2020, Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement chal-lenges and further reflections, World Development, 127: 104570, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ abs/pii/S0305750X19301445 (04.08.2023).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.024
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Data Browser, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/explore/all/all_themes (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Employment rate by sex, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_30/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Real GDP per capita, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_10/default/table? lang=en (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Income share of the bottom 40 % of the population, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_10_50/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Persons at risk of monetary poverty after social transfers – EU-SILC and ECHP surveys, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_01_20/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: General government total expenditure on law courts, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/SDG_16_30/default/table (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Perceived independence of the justice system, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/page/SDG_16_40 (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Corruption Perceptions Index, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ SDG_16_50/default/table (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Population with confidence in EU institutions by institution, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/SDG_16_60/default/table (20.08.2023).
Google Scholar
GUZEL A. E., ARSLAN U., ACARAVCI A., 2021, The impact of economic, social, and political globalization and de-mocracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory?, Environment, De-velopment and Sustainability, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2
Google Scholar
HENFREY T., FEOLA G., PENHA‐LOPES G., SEKULOVA F., ESTEVES A. M, 2023, Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives, Sustainable Development, 31(1): 211-222, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2384
Google Scholar
HICKEL J, 2019, The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet, Sus-tainable Development, 27(5): 873-884, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947
Google Scholar
INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY AGENCY, 2019, Innovation landscape for a renewable-powered future: Solutions to integrate variable renewables, Abu Dhabi, https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Feb/IRENA_Innovation_Landscape_2019_report.pdf?rev=754a9a1985434152ba4eaa5ef80b7225 (03.08.2023).
Google Scholar
KOPNINA H., 2016, The victims of unsustainability: A challenge to sustainable development goals, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(2): 113-121, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1111269 (06.08.2023).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1111269
Google Scholar
KULINICH T., DOBIZHA N., DEMCHENKO O., BODNAR O., MYRONCHUK V., ZELENSKYI A., 2022, Micro-finance: Methods, Models and its Impact on Economic Development, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Develop-ment, 18 144-151, https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.16
Google Scholar
MARTYNOVYCH N., BOICHENKO E., DIELINI M. (2023) Renovation of Ukraine After War: Special Restoration Regimes and Stimulation of Sustainable Development of Territories, International review for spatial planning and sus-tainable development, 11(4): 57-70, https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_54
Google Scholar
MARTYNOVYCH N., YEMCHENKO I., KULINICH T., 2023, From the territory of recovery to sustainable develop-ment: A methodological concept of effective socio-economic development of Ukraine after the war, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2): 12-24, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3923.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3923
Google Scholar
OECD, 2012, Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development-2012_persp_glob_dev-2012-en (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
OECD, 2021, Perspectives on Global Development 2021: From Protest to Progress?. OECD Development Centre, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development-2021_405e4c32-en (4.09.2023).
Google Scholar
RASZKOWSKI A, BARTNICZAK B., 2019, On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustain-able Development Goals (SDG) in Poland, Sustainability, 11(2): 366, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366
Google Scholar
UNDP, 2022, Human development report 2021-22, https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22 (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNESCO, 2019, Thematic Indicators for Culture in the 2030 Agenda, https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ documents/publication_culture_2020_indicators_en.pdf (10.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNESCO, 2017, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2002, United Nations Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September, New York, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/636/ 93/PDF/N0263693.pdf?OpenElement (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 1993, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, 3 – 14 June 1992, New York https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N92/836/55/PDF/ N9283655.pdf?OpenElement (4.09.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September (A/70/L.1), https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/ migra-tion/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2022, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/ 2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf (11.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, United Nations, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/9814/-Transforming_our_world_the_2030_ Agenda_ for_Sustainable_Development-2015TransformingOurWorld_2015.pdf.pdf?sequence=3&%3BisAllowed= (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 1992, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21 (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
SACHS J.D., SCHMIDT-TRAUB G., MAZZUCATO M. et al., 2019, Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, Nat Sustain, 2: 805-814, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Google Scholar
SCHANDLH., HATFIELD-DODDS S., WIEDMANN T., GESCHKE A., CAI Y., WESTJ., OWEN A., 2016, Decou-pling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions, Journal of cleaner production, 132: 45-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100
Google Scholar
SPAISER V., RANGANATHAN S., SWAINR. B., SUMPTER D. J., 2017, The sustainable development oxymoron: quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals, International Journal of Sustainable De-velopment & World Ecology, 24(6): 457-470, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624
Google Scholar
WORLD BANK, 2013, Inclusive Green Growth Development, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6
Google Scholar
WORLD BANK, 2022, World Bank, World Development Report 2022, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication /wdr2022 (02.08.2023).
Google Scholar
Authors
Daria Mykhailenkod.g.mykhailenko@ukr.net
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Department Marketing, Management and Entrepreneurship, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8420-6510
Authors
Olena HavrylchenkoSimon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-2938
Authors
Lidiia BezkorovainaSimon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-0626
Authors
Nataliia GliebovaNational University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-3867
Authors
Viktoriia KovalovaNational University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-6971
Statistics
Abstract views: 234PDF downloads: 383
