Progress in the Field of Sustainable Development as a Result of Implementing the Potential of Social Cohesion: Regional Context
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024)
-
SWOT Analysis of the Sustainable Development Concept
Magdaléna Drastichová6-30
-
The Influence of the World Grain Market on Prevalence of Mankind’s Undernourishment in the Times of War on the Ukraine
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Allam Yousuf, Vira Butenko, Tetiana Kulinich, Olena Bohdaniuk, Liudmyla Nikolenko, Ruslan Lavrov31-42
-
Environmental Sustainability in Developing Countries: Does Democracy Matter?
Neslihan Ursavaş, Şükrü Apaydın43-52
-
The Role of Corruption in the Implementation of Environmental Regulations
Asli Özpolat, Ferda Nakipoglu Ozsoy53-66
-
Attitudes Towards Environmental Protection in International Comparative Research
Pawel Rydzewski67-77
-
Using the Composite EEPSE Green Economy Index to Assess the Progress of Emerging Economies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Sunčica Stanković, Biljana Ilić, Mihajlo Rabrenović78-88
-
Digital Transformation in the Context of Sustainable Development of European Countries
Irina Kolupaieva, Iryna Sheiko, Tetiana Polozova89-102
-
Impact of Digitalization on International Financial Security in Conditions of Sustainable Development
Oksana Desyatnyuk, Mariya Naumenko, Iryna Lytovchenko, Oleksandr Beketov104-114
-
Evaluation and Deconstruction of the Impact of Digital Finance on the Synergy of Enterprise Economic Development and Ecological Environment
Shining Zhang115-121
-
Assessing Forest Conservation Strategies for Biodiversity Restoration and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis of Global Income Groups
Rima H. Binsaeed, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Khalid Zaman, Zeeshan Arshad, Mohamed Haffar, Dadang Yunus Lutfiansyah, Kamalularifin Subari, Hailan Salamun122-147
-
Interculturality as Paradigm to Promote Social and Environmental Sustainability
Anthony Le Duc148-158
-
Role of Ethics in Nature-Human Relationship: a Pragmatic Inquiry
Anita Jena159-166
-
The Concept of Inclusive Economy as a Component of Sustainable Development
Andriy Krysovatyy, Olena Ptashchenko, Oleksii Kurtsev, Arutyunyan Ovagim164-172
-
The Evolution Path and Impact Mechanism of the Vulnerability of Rural Human Settlements in China under the Background of Globalization
Fulong Liu, Baogang Lin, Kun Meng173-179
-
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Impact of Socio-economic Factors on Water Pollution
Bizhen Chen, Shanshan Xie, Dehong Sun180-192
-
Global Country Classification of Sustainable Startups Levels
Barbara Bradač Hojnik193-200
-
Progress in the Field of Sustainable Development as a Result of Implementing the Potential of Social Cohesion: Regional Context
Daria Mykhailenko, Olena Havrylchenko, Lidiia Bezkorovaina, Nataliia Gliebova, Viktoriia Kovalova201-212
-
Construction of China’s Carbon Financial Accounting System from the Perspective of Sustainable Development
Shuwen Li213-220
-
Entrepreneurship and Carbon Footprints in Sub-Saharan Africa
Linjing Zhu, Yuefen Wang221-231
-
Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Conditions of Rational Expectations by Achieving a Balance of Interests of Education and Production in the Field of Light Industry During Troubled Times of Pandemic and War
Galyna Ripka, Yaroslav Bielousov, Ievgen Maznev232-250
-
A Few Remarks on Sustainable Development of the Education Sphere. Postulated and Factual Improving of Education
Wieslaw Sztumski251-260
-
Measuring the Impact of Higher Education in Promoting Sustainable Development Goals: Analysis of the Arab universities’ performance
Saleh A. K. Saleh, Heba M. Adly261-274
-
A Homogeneity of European Union and Western Balkan Countries According to Travel and Tourism Sustainability
Sonja Jovanović, Vesna Janković-Milić, Marija Petrović-Ranđelović275-284
-
Analysis of the Decisive Factors of Government Attracting Tourists in Public Management from the Perspective of Environmental Protection
Zhicheng Guo, Yan Li285-295
-
Assessing International Tourism's Global Environmental Impact of Food and Beverages
Josef Lochman, Jiří Vagner296-307
-
Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion
Fengjiao Ye, Xueru Wang, Jun Lin308-324
-
Re-evaluating the Alignment of Omnivorous Choice and Animal Farming with Sustainable Development: Insights from Care Ethics
Upamita Mukherjee, Prabhu Venkataraman325-329
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The study examines the role of social cohesion in the context of sustainable development of regional societies. It is proved that progress in the field of sustainable development depends on social cohesion as one of the factors ensuring the achievement of environmental, economic and social changes. A mechanism of social cohesion has been developed, the result of which, along with social stability and justice, strengthening citizens' trust in state and public institutions, social welfare, is a request for sustainable development of regions. The article proves that modern challenges, such as social inequality, migration and ethnic differences, can weaken the potential of social cohesion as a catalyst for sustainable development of regions.
To quantify the level of social cohesion, a system of indicators is proposed that integrates economic, demographic, educational and other indicators, and allows for a detailed analysis of the current state of social cohesion in various regions. Taking into account the impact of social cohesion indicators on the progress of sustainable development of regions is realised through the inclusion of indicators that reflect the level of social cohesion potential and, at the same time, are a source of data for assessing the achievement of sustainable development goals.
Using the example of the EU countries, the analysis of indicators related to the blocks of trust in institutions and economic indicators in assessing the level of social cohesion was carried out. The estimated indicators are also taken into account when calculating the achievement of the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS): SDG 1, SDG 8, SDG 10, SDG 16. The proposed approach makes it possible to take into account the indicators that are most vulnerable in terms of their impact on the progress of regions in the field of sustainable development, as well as to form a list of measures, the implementation of which will ensure capacity building of the social cohesion mechanism (hereinafter referred to as SCM).
The main innovative contribution of the study is the development of an economic and mathematical model for optimizing resources and prioritizing measures aimed at strengthening social cohesion. The model takes into account the amount of available resources, the need to use them for the implementation of specific activities and an expert assessment of their priority. This approach provides an objective and systematic solution to the challenges of sustainable development, focusing on social cohesion as a key factor. The study proves that the application of the model requires high-quality data, competence in the process of interpreting modelling results and active interaction with stakeholders. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the integration of social cohesion into strategic planning and the application of the proposed model are the basis for more effective and sustainable development of regional society.
Keywords:
References
BARANOVA V., KULINICH T., DUTCHAK O., ZVONAR V., DENYSHCHENKO L., 2021, Development of corpo-rate social responsibility in business as a factor of fiscal decentralization, Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 8(3): 411-424, https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.760
DANG H. A. H., SERAJUDDIN U., 2020, Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement chal-lenges and further reflections, World Development, 127: 104570, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ abs/pii/S0305750X19301445 (04.08.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.024
EUROSTAT, 2023, Data Browser, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/explore/all/all_themes (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Employment rate by sex, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_30/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Real GDP per capita, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_10/default/table? lang=en (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Income share of the bottom 40 % of the population, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_10_50/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Persons at risk of monetary poverty after social transfers – EU-SILC and ECHP surveys, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_01_20/default/table?lang=en (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: General government total expenditure on law courts, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/SDG_16_30/default/table (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Perceived independence of the justice system, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/page/SDG_16_40 (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Corruption Perceptions Index, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ SDG_16_50/default/table (20.08.2023).
EUROSTAT, 2023, Eurostat: Population with confidence in EU institutions by institution, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/SDG_16_60/default/table (20.08.2023).
GUZEL A. E., ARSLAN U., ACARAVCI A., 2021, The impact of economic, social, and political globalization and de-mocracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory?, Environment, De-velopment and Sustainability, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2
HENFREY T., FEOLA G., PENHA‐LOPES G., SEKULOVA F., ESTEVES A. M, 2023, Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives, Sustainable Development, 31(1): 211-222, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2384
HICKEL J, 2019, The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet, Sus-tainable Development, 27(5): 873-884, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947
INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY AGENCY, 2019, Innovation landscape for a renewable-powered future: Solutions to integrate variable renewables, Abu Dhabi, https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Feb/IRENA_Innovation_Landscape_2019_report.pdf?rev=754a9a1985434152ba4eaa5ef80b7225 (03.08.2023).
KOPNINA H., 2016, The victims of unsustainability: A challenge to sustainable development goals, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(2): 113-121, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1111269 (06.08.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1111269
KULINICH T., DOBIZHA N., DEMCHENKO O., BODNAR O., MYRONCHUK V., ZELENSKYI A., 2022, Micro-finance: Methods, Models and its Impact on Economic Development, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Develop-ment, 18 144-151, https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.16
MARTYNOVYCH N., BOICHENKO E., DIELINI M. (2023) Renovation of Ukraine After War: Special Restoration Regimes and Stimulation of Sustainable Development of Territories, International review for spatial planning and sus-tainable development, 11(4): 57-70, https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4_54
MARTYNOVYCH N., YEMCHENKO I., KULINICH T., 2023, From the territory of recovery to sustainable develop-ment: A methodological concept of effective socio-economic development of Ukraine after the war, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2): 12-24, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3923
OECD, 2012, Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development-2012_persp_glob_dev-2012-en (02.08.2023).
OECD, 2021, Perspectives on Global Development 2021: From Protest to Progress?. OECD Development Centre, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development-2021_405e4c32-en (4.09.2023).
RASZKOWSKI A, BARTNICZAK B., 2019, On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustain-able Development Goals (SDG) in Poland, Sustainability, 11(2): 366, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366
UNDP, 2022, Human development report 2021-22, https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22 (02.08.2023).
UNESCO, 2019, Thematic Indicators for Culture in the 2030 Agenda, https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ documents/publication_culture_2020_indicators_en.pdf (10.08.2023).
UNESCO, 2017, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (02.08.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 2002, United Nations Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September, New York, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/636/ 93/PDF/N0263693.pdf?OpenElement (02.08.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 1993, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, 3 – 14 June 1992, New York https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N92/836/55/PDF/ N9283655.pdf?OpenElement (4.09.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September (A/70/L.1), https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/ migra-tion/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (02.08.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 2022, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/ 2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf (11.08.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, United Nations, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/9814/-Transforming_our_world_the_2030_ Agenda_ for_Sustainable_Development-2015TransformingOurWorld_2015.pdf.pdf?sequence=3&%3BisAllowed= (02.08.2023).
UNITED NATIONS, 1992, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21 (02.08.2023).
SACHS J.D., SCHMIDT-TRAUB G., MAZZUCATO M. et al., 2019, Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, Nat Sustain, 2: 805-814, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
SCHANDLH., HATFIELD-DODDS S., WIEDMANN T., GESCHKE A., CAI Y., WESTJ., OWEN A., 2016, Decou-pling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions, Journal of cleaner production, 132: 45-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100
SPAISER V., RANGANATHAN S., SWAINR. B., SUMPTER D. J., 2017, The sustainable development oxymoron: quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals, International Journal of Sustainable De-velopment & World Ecology, 24(6): 457-470, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624
WORLD BANK, 2013, Inclusive Green Growth Development, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6
WORLD BANK, 2022, World Bank, World Development Report 2022, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication /wdr2022 (02.08.2023).
Article Details
Abstract views: 498

