Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe

Magdaléna Drastichová; Peter Filzmoser

doi:10.35784/preko.6666

Open full text

PDF

Published: Jan 10, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6666

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Articles

The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski

1-5
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du

6-14
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski

15-24
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma

25-33
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova

34-42
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser

43-73
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal

74-95
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski

96-108
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He

109-128
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar

129-142
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu

143-158
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov

159-173
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie

174-189
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak

190-207
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova

207-220
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan

221-235
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė

236-244
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang

245-260
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua

261-270
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang

271-287
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan

288-309
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding

310-328

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6666

Authors

Magdaléna Drastichová

magdalena.drastichova@vsb.cz

Moravská Vysoká Škola Olomouc, Czechia

Peter Filzmoser

peter.filzmoser@tuwien.ac.at

Vienna University of Technology, Austria

Abstract

This study evaluates the progress of 31 countries, including EU member states, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (UK), towards the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (SD) and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) over the period 2012–2020. The analysis employs indicators from the EU SDG indicator set, which monitors progress towards the SDGs within the EU context. The objective is to identify which sustainability concepts these countries gravitate towards as they advance towards the SDGs and specific indicators within the EU SDG set. The study assesses progress and alignment with the overarching concept of sustainable development as well as with more focused practical approaches, such as green economy/growth and circular economy, and more complex alternative concepts like degrowth and compassionate economy. The biclustering method is applied to uncover relationships between countries and indicators, resulting in clusters that combine five groups of countries with ten groups of indicators. These clusters exhibit varying degrees of progress across sustainable development, green economy/growth, circular economy, compassionate economy, and degrowth based on the indicator values. Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Sweden are identified as the top performers in overall sustainability. Notably, Switzerland and Norway show the greatest alignment with degrowth and compassionate economy concepts, while the Netherlands and Italy excel in circular economy and green economy/growth. The novelty of this article lies in the innovative application of the biclustering method combined with point-based evaluation of indicators within the SDG set, providing a unique perspective on the progress of these 31 countries towards sustainability. Furthermore, the identification of countries’ inclination towards specific sustainability concepts represents a key innovation in this work.

Keywords:

biclustering, circular economy, compassionate economy, degrowth, sustainability, wellbeing

References

1. ASARA V., OTERO I., DEMARIA F., CORBERA E., 2015, Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation, Sustainability Science 10(3): 375-384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9

2. ATKISSON A., 2013, A fresh start for sustainable development, Development 56(1): 52-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.2

3. BARBIER E.B., 2012, The green economy post Rio+20, Science 338: 887-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227360

4. BEEKS J.C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative economics are the best for adequately and comprehensively addressing the great transition to climate, energy, and biodiversity sustainability?, California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.

5. BELING A.E., VANHULST J., DEMARIA F., RABI V., CARBALLO A.E., PELENC J., 2018, Discursive synergies for a ‘great transformation’ towards sustainability: Pragmatic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, degrowth, and buen vivir, Ecological Economics 144: 304-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025

6. BELMONTE-UREÑA L.J., PLAZA-ÚBEDA J.A., VAZQUEZ-BRUST D., YAKOVLEVA N., 2021, Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda, Ecological Economics 185: 107050, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050

7. BINA O., 2013, The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance?, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 31(6): 1023-1047, https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j

8. BINA O., LA CAMERA F., 2011, Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the ‘double crisis’, Ecological Economics 70(12): 2308-2316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.021

9. BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity, Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3): 603-614, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603

10. BOWEN A., FANKHAUSER S., STERN N., ZENGHELIS D., 2009, An outline of the case for a ‘green’ stimulus, Policy Brief, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.

11. BRIGHTON C., 2017, Unlikely bedfellows: The evolution of the relationship between environmental protection and development, International Comparative Law Quarterly 66(1): 209-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931600052X

12. BROWN E., CLOKE J., GENT D., JOHNSON P.H., HILL C., 2014, Green growth or ecological commodification: Debating the green economy in the global south, Geographical Annals: Series B, Human Geography 96(3): 245-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12049

13. BÜCHS M., KOCH M., 2017, Postgrowth and wellbeing: Challenges to sustainable welfare, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59903-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59903-8_5

14. CAPASSO M., HANSEN T., HEIBERG J., KLITKOU A., STEHEN M., 2019, Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 146: 390-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013

15. COLBY M., 1989, The evolution of paradigms of environmental management in development, Strategic Planning and Review Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.

16. COSTANZA R., DALY L., FIORAMONTI L., GIOVANNI E., KUBISZEWSKA I., MORTENSEN L.F., PICKETT K.E., RAGNARSDOTTIR K.V., DE VOGLI R., WILKINSON R., 2016, Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN sustainable development goals, Ecological Economics 130: 350-355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009

17. D’ALISA G., DEMARIA F., KALLIS G. (Eds.), 2014, Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York.

18. DALE G., MATHAI M.V., PUPPIM DE OLIVEIRA J.A., 2015, Green growth: Ideology, political economy and the alternatives, Zed Books, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350220553

19. DEMARIA F., SCHNEIDER F., SEKULOVA F., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2013, What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement, Environmental Values 22(2): 191-215, https://doi.org/10.2307/23460978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194

20. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2024, SWOT analysis of the sustainable development concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 19(1): 6-30, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5431

21. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2023, Sustainable development and sustainable science. Where we came from, where we are now and where we are heading? Part II: An in-depth analysis of the concept of sustainable development, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(1): 9-27, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.02

22. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2022, Sustainable development and sustainable science. Where we came from, where we are now and where we are heading? Part I: The history of the concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2): 7-18, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01

23. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2018, The theory and measurement of sustainable development, SAEI 52, VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava.

24. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., GAJANIN R., 2023, Relationships between wellbeing and sustainable development in a group of selected developed countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2): 49-77, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941

25. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2021, Factors of quality of life in a group of selected European Union and OECD countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(2): 75-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09

26. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2019, Assessment of sustainable development using cluster analysis and principal component analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju 14(2): 7-24.

27. DRYZEK J.S., 1998, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

28. DRYZEK J.S., 2013, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

29. DUNLAP R.E., MERTIG A.G., 1992, American environmentalism: The US environmental movement, 1970-1990, Taylor & Francis, New York.

30. FOURNIER V., 2008, Escaping from the economy: The politics of degrowth, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 28(11/12): 528-545, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810915233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810915233

31. FOWLER S., HOPE C., 2007, A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact, Journal of Business Ethics 76: 243-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2

32. GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N.M.P., HULTINK E.J., 2017, The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757-768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

33. GIDDENS A., 2011, The politics of climate change, Polity Press, Cambridge.

34. GIAMPIETRO M., MAYUMI K., SORMAN A.H., 2012, The metabolic pattern of societies: Where economists fall short, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203635926

35. HICKEL J., 2020, The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the Anthropocene, Ecological Economics 167: 106331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011

36. HOPWOOD B., MELLOR M., O’BRIEN G., 2005, Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches, Sustainable Development 13(1): 38-52, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244

37. IPCC, 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ (31.12.2024).

38. JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy, Sustainable Development Commission, London.

39. JACKSON T., 2017, Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow, 2nd ed., Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London and New York.

40. JÄNICKE M., 2012, ‘Green growth’: From a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability, Energy Policy 48: 13-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045

41. KERSCHNER C., 2010, Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy, Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 544-551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019

42. KIRCHHERR J., REIKE D., HEKKERT M., 2017, Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

43. KOTHARI A., SALLEH A., ESCOBAR A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A. (Eds.), 2019, Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary, Tulika Books and Authors Upfront, New Delhi, and Columbia University Press, New York.

44. KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A., 2014, Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy, Development 57: 362-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24

45. LINNÉR B.-O., WIBEBCK V., 2019, Sustainability transformations: Agents and drivers across societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766975

46. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., 2009, Socially sustainable economic degrowth, Development and Change 40(6): 1099-1119, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x

47. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F.-D., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, Ecological Economics 69(9): 1741-1747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017

48. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., KALLIS G., VEUTHEY S., WALTER M., TEMPER L., 2010, Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages, Ecological Economics 70(2): 153-158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024

49. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., 2002, The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486

50. MUNDA G., 1997, Environmental economics, ecological economics, and the concept of sustainable development, Environmental Values 6(2): 213-233, https://doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096327199700600206

51. MUNDA G., 2016, Beyond welfare economics: Some thoughts on ecological economics and the political economy of sustainability, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 13(1): 57-66.

52. NÆSS A., 1989, Ecology, community, and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599

53. O’NEILL D.W., FANNING A.L., LAMB W.F., STEINBERGER J.K., 2018, A good life for all within planetary boundaries, Nature Sustainability 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4

54. PIKETTY T., 2014, Capital in the twenty-first century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542

55. POLIMENI J.M., MAYUMI K., GIAMPIETRO M., ALCOTT B., 2008, The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements, Earthscan, London.

56. REICHEL A., SEEBERG B., 2011, From business to multipliers: Integrating the idea of decoupling into the prevailing economic concepts, Environmental Values 20(4): 493-517.

57. ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., DE WIT C.A., HUGHES T., VAN DER LEEUW S., RODHE H., SÖRLIN S., SNYDER P.K., COSTANZA R., SVEDIN U., FALKENMARK M., KARLBERG L., CORELL R.W., FABRY V.J., HANSEN J., WALKER B., LIVERMAN D., RICHARDSON K., CRUTZEN P., FOLEY J.A., 2009, Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity, Ecology and Society 14(2): 32, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

58. SANYÉ-MENGUAL E., LOZANO R.G., FARRENY R., OLIVER-SOLÀ J., MONTERO J.I., RIERADEVALL J., 2014, Introduction of urban rooftop agriculture to increase the sustainability of the built environment: A life cycle assessment of the Mediterranean context, Journal of Cleaner Production 74: 167-177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.030

59. SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 511-518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

60. SOLOW R.M., 1993, An almost practical step toward sustainability, Resources Policy 19(3): 162-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4

61. THROSBY D., 2005, On the sustainability of cultural capital, Macquarie Economics Research Papers 5/2005, Department of Economics, Macquarie University.

62. UN, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

63. UNEP, 2011, Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf (31.12.2024).

64. VICTOR P.A., 2008, Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848442993.00016

65. VAN DEN BERGH J.C.J.M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, a-growth or degrowth to stay within planetary boundaries?, Journal of Economic Issues 46(4): 909-920, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404

66. ANDEVENTER J.S., CATTANEO C., ZOGRAFOS C., 2019, A degrowth transition: Pathways for the degrowth niche to replace the capitalist-growth regime, Ecological Economics 156: 272-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.002

67. WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.

68. WEISS M., CATTANEO C., 2017, Degrowth–Taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm, Ecological Economics 137: 220-233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014

69. WIEDMANN T.O., SCHANDL H., LENZEN M., MORAN D., SUH S., WEST J., KANEMOTO K., 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112(20): 6271-6276, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110

70. WORLD BANK, DRC, 2012, China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society, The World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, the People’s Republic of China, Washington, DC, http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/China-2030-complete.pdf (31.12.2024).

71. ZWIERS J., JAEGER-ERBEN M., HOFMANN F., 2020, Circular literacy: A knowledge-based approach to the circular economy, Culture and Organization 26(2): 121-141, https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1709065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1709065

Drastichová, M., & Filzmoser, P. (2025). Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 20(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6666

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Downloads

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License

Downloads