Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
-
The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski1-5
-
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du6-14
-
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski15-24
-
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma25-33
-
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova34-42
-
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser43-73
-
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal74-95
-
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski96-108
-
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He109-128
-
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar129-142
-
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu143-158
-
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov159-173
-
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie174-189
-
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak190-207
-
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova207-220
-
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan221-235
-
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė236-244
-
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang245-260
-
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua261-270
-
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang271-287
-
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan288-309
-
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding310-328
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
As the economic scale continues to grow, issues related to China's energy supply security have become increasingly severe. Energy security remains a crucial concern in China's development. Especially in the face of the international turmoil in recent years, for China, an economy with high dependence on foreign energy, the risk of energy security stability is inevitably transmitted to other economic fields, causing a series of problems. This study quantitatively evaluates China's energy security over the period from 2013 to 2022. Based on 35 specific indicators of China's energy industry, an index system of energy security, comprising four dimensions – energy production, consumption, environmental impact, and energy supply – and the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) entropy method, has been adopted. The results show that the overall condition of energy security in China is at an upper-middle level, with notable differences across various dimensions. The coordination of energy production, consumption, environmental impact, and energy supply faces challenges due to multiple factors. In terms of energy production and consumption, China’s energy security exhibits relatively higher levels of sustainable development, while the environment and energy supply dimensions face significantly more difficulties, revealing the urgency of sustainable development in China's energy sector: under the dual pressures of maintaining economic growth as well as protecting the environment, increasing policy support for the renewable energy industry and increasing its share of the energy production and consumption structure is a feasible solution. It is recommended to promote reforms in energy technology, international energy cooperation and innovation to provide diversified guarantees for China's energy security.
Keywords:
References
1. KNOX-HAYES J., BROWN M.A., SOVACOOL B.K., WANG Y., 2013, Understanding atti-tudes toward energy security: Results of a cross-national survey, Global Environmental Change 23(3): 609-622, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.003
2. ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2023, Statistical Review of World Energy 2023, https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review.
3. YERGIN D., 1988, Energy security in the 1990s, Foreign Affairs 67: 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20043677
4. WINZER C., 2012, Conceptualizing energy security, Energy Policy 46: 36-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067
5. CHERP A., JEWELL J., 2014, The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As, Energy Policy 75: 415-421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005
6. BIELECKI J., 2002, Energy security: Is the wolf at the door?, The Quarterly Review of Eco-nomics and Finance 42(2): 235-250, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00137-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00137-0
7. AZZUNI A., BREYER C., 2018, Definitions and dimensions of energy security: A literature review, WIREs Energy and Environment 7(1): e268, https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.268
8. CHESTER L., 2010, Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic na-ture, Energy Policy 38(2): 887-895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039
9. BANG G., 2010, Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States?, Energy Policy 38(4): 1645-1653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.045
10. KIM J.E., 2014, Energy security and climate change: How oil endowment influences alterna-tive vehicle innovation, Energy Policy 66(C): 400-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.011
11. OZTURK I., 2013, Energy dependency and energy security: The role of energy efficiency and renewable energy sources, The Pakistan Development Review 52(4): 309-330.
12. SELVAKKUMARAN S., LIMMEECHOKCHAI B., 2013, Energy security and co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in three Asian countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 20: 491-503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.004
13. BAUBLYS J., MIŠKINIS V., KONSTANTINAVIČIŪTĖ I., LEKAVIČIUS V., 2015, Energy efficiency as precondition of energy security, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 4(3): 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.3(1)
14. SKEA J., CHAUDRY M., WANG X., 2012, The role of gas infrastructure in promoting UK energy security, Energy Policy 43: 202-213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.057
15. BURGHERR P., GIROUX J., SPADA M., 2015, Accidents in the energy sector and energy infrastructure attacks in the context of energy security, European Journal of Risk Regulation 6(2): 271-283, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004578
16. LARSON R.B., 2013, Reconciling energy and food security, University of Richmond Law Review 48: 929.
17. OGBOLUMANI O.A., NWULU N.I., 2022, A food-energy-water nexus meta-model for food and energy security, Sustainable Production and Consumption 30: 438-453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.019
18. PASQUALINO R., MONASTEROLO I., JONES A., 2019, An integrated global food and energy security system dynamics model for addressing systemic risk, Sustainability 11(14): 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143995
19. DOWNS E.S., 2004, The Chinese energy security debate, The China Quarterly 177: 21-41, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741004000037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741004000037
20. DE ROSA M., GAINSFORD K., PALLONETTO F., FINN D.P., 2022, Diversification, con-centration and renewability of the energy supply in the European Union, Energy 253: 124097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124097
21. WANG Q., ZHOU K., 2017, A framework for evaluating global national energy security, Applied Energy 188: 19-31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.116
22. CHANG Y., YONG J., 2007, Differing perspectives of major oil firms on future energy de-velopments: An illustrative framework, Energy Policy 35(11): 546605480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.013
23. KRUYT B., VAN VUUREN D.P., DE VRIES H.J.M., GROENENBERG H., 2009, Indicators for energy security, Energy Policy 37(6): 216602181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.006
24. REN J., SOVACOOL B.K., 2014, Quantifying, measuring, and strategizing energy security: Determining the most meaningful dimensions and metrics, Energy 76: 838-849, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.083
25. SOVACOOL B.K., BROWN M.A., 2010, Competing dimensions of energy security: An international perspective, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 77-108, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042509-143035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042509-143035
26. YERGIN D., 2006, Ensuring energy security, Foreign Affairs 85(2): 69-82, https://doi.org/10.2307/20031912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20031912
27. ANG B.W., CHOONG W.L., NG T.S., 2015, Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42: 1077-1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064
28. KILINÇ‐PALA P.B., 2021, Approaches in energy exclusive security: Theories of energy security and the dominance of realism, Politics & Policy 49(3): 771-794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12411
29. VAN DE GRAAF T., COLGAN J., 2016, Global energy governance: A review and research agenda, Palgrave Communications 2(1): 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.47
30. NYMAN J., 2013, Securitization theory, Critical Approaches to Security, Routledge: 51-62.
31. HEINRICH A., SZULECKI K., 2018, Energy securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s framework to energy, Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Poli-cy Challenges, ed. Szulecki K, Springer International Publishing: 33-59, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_2
32. LEUNG G.C.K., CHERP A., JEWELL J., WEI Y.-M., 2014, Securitization of energy supply chains in China, Applied Energy 123: 316-326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.016
33. GASSER P., 2020, A review on energy security indices to compare country performances, Energy Policy 139: 111339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111339
34. CHERCHYE L., MOESEN W., ROGGE N., PUYENBROECK T., 2011, Constructing com-posite indicators with imprecise data: A proposal, Expert Systems with Applications 38: 10940-10949, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.136
35. ASIA PACIFIC ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE, 2007, A quest for energy security in the 21st century: Resources and constraints, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan.
36. CAI Q., CHEN H., ZHENG N., CHEN H., SHI P., LI Y., ZHENG Y., 2024, Quantifying en-ergy security and influencing factors based on entropy weighted TOPSIS and machine learn-ing, Advances in Energy Resources and Environmental Engineering, eds. Abomohra A., Ha-run R., Wen J., Springer International Publishing; 245,256, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42563-9_25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42563-9_25
37. YANG Y., ZHENG X., SUN Z., 2020, Coal resource security assessment in China: A study using entropy-weight-based TOPSIS and BP neural network, Sustainability 12(6): 2294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062294
38. AN Y., TAN X., GU B., ZHU K., SHI L., DING Z., 2023, An assessment of renewable ener-gy development in Belt and Road Initiative countries: An entropy and TOPSIS approach, Energy Reports 10: 3545-3560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.085
39. ZHAO D., LI C., WANG Q., YUAN J., 2020, Comprehensive evaluation of national electric power development based on cloud model and entropy method and TOPSIS: A case study in 11 countries, Journal of Cleaner Production 277: 123190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123190
40. ADUN H., 2023, Sustainability energy security: 20 years assessment of the West African nations using a comprehensive entropy-TOPSIS analysis, Environmental Science and Pollu-tion Research 30(33): 81093-81112, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28116-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28116-5
41. ZOU T., GUO P., WU Q., 2023, Applying an entropy-weighted TOPSIS method to evaluate energy green consumption revolution progressing of China, Environmental Science and Pol-lution Research 30(14): 42267-42281, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25175-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25175-6
42. AL-SAIDI M., 2023, White knight or partner of choice? The Ukraine war and the role of the Middle East in the energy security of Europe, Energy Strategy Reviews 49: 101116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101116
43. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS OF CHINA, 2024, https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/ (3.10.2024).
44. 中国能源统计年鉴 (China Energy Statistics Yearbook), http://www.zgtjcbs.com/books/booksdetail.jsp?id=5661&nodeid=461&siteid=2 (23.07.2024).
45. STATISTICAL REVIEW OF WORLD ENERGY, 2023, https://www.energyinst.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1408075/5456af7ed79ea2b1943197dce2f0b019e78f3ee2.pdf (23.07.2024).
46. HWANG C.-L., YOON K., 1981, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey, eds. Hwang C.-L., Yoon K., Springer: 58-191, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
47. KAYNAK S., ALTUNTAS S., DERELI T., 2017, Comparing the innovation performance of EU candidate countries: An entropy-based TOPSIS approach, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30(1): 31-54, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895
48. ZHENG H., SI D., WANG W., WANG R., 2018, Quantitative entropy weight TOPSIS evalu-ation of sustainable Chinese wind power developments, Mathematical Problems in Engi-neering 2018: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6965439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6965439
49. DOĞAN B., FERRAZ D., GUPTA M., HUYNH T.L.D., SHAHZADI I., 2022, Exploring the effects of import diversification on energy efficiency: Evidence from the OECD economies, Renewable Energy 189: 639-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.018
50. ZOU C., PAN S., HAO Q., 2020, On the connotation, challenge and significance of China’s ‘energy independence’ strategy, Petroleum Exploration and Development 47(2): 449-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60062-3
51. UNITED NATIONS, 2015, The 17 goals of sustainable development, https://sdgs.un.org/goals (4.12.2024).
52. LIU Z., DENG Z., HE G., WANG H., ZHANG X., LIN J., …, LIANG X., 2022, Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 3(2): 141-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00244-x
53. RADOVANOVIĆ M., FILIPOVIĆ S., PAVLOVIĆ D., 2017, Energy security measurement – A sustainable approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 1020-1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.010
Article Details
Abstract views: 424

