THE ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION FOR CALIBRATION


Abstract

A comparative analysis of the measurement uncertainty estimation result is carried out. The results are obtained by GUM method described in the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, as well as by Monte-Carlo method recommended in Supplement 1 to the Guide. Examples of calculations of uncertainty of relative error for electromagnetic flow meters calibration by two methods are given. The features of application, advantages and disadvantages of these methods are described.


Keywords

measurement uncertainty; GUM and Monte Carlo uncertainty estimation methods; calibration of an electromagnetic flowmeter

Efremova N.Yu., Chunovkina A.G.: Development of the concept of "measurement uncertainty" and revision of the "Guide to the expression of measurement uncertainty". Part 1. Reasons and theoretical-probability basis of the revision. Measurement techniques 4/2016, 9–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-017-1195-2

Electromagnetic flowmeters. Method of calibration: Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology of the Republic of Kazakhstan. SD RK 2.328-2015. Astana 2015.

Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”. Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008, 2008.

General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2017, 2017.

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: First Edition. – ISO(GUM:1993), Switzerland 1993.

International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM), JCGM 200:2012, 2012.

Khan S.G., Tashibayeva A.E., Bukayeva G.: Development of program for estimating of Corolis flowmeters’ measurement uncertainty. Vestnik AUPET 1(40)/2018, 34–39.

Download

Published : 2019-09-26


Zhussupbekov, S., Ibrayeva , L., & Zhussupbekov, S. (2019). THE ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION FOR CALIBRATION. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 9(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.233

Sarsenbek Zhussupbekov  khan.sv2011@gmail.com
Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty, Kazakhstan  Kazakhstan
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-6690
Lida Ibrayeva  
Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty, Kazakhstan  Kazakhstan
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-6685
Sarsenbek Zhussupbekov 
Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty, Kazakhstan  Kazakhstan
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-713X