VIRTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION VS. ACTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN THE CONSERVATION OF FRAGMENTARY ARTEFACTS: THE CASE STUDY FRESCOES FROM SYBARIS - COPIA (ITALY)

Sokol Muca

doi:10.35784/odk.1087

Open full text

PDF

Published: Dec 20, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.1087

Issue No. 8 (2019)

Articles

„OPEN FOR CONSERVATION”: LIVE EXPERIENCES
Cobau Andreina Costanzi

79-88
THE ETHICAL PROBLEMS OF ARCHITECTURAL RECONSTRUCTION – HUNGARIAN CASE STUDIES
Ádám Arnóth

1-8
ON PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVITY
Wolfgang Baatz

9-14
REFLECTION ON CONSERVATION-RESTORATION PRACTICE TODAY. A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE
Stefan Belishki, Susan Corr

15-28
AFTER BRANDI – UMBERTO BALDINI AND THE MODERN THEORY OF CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN ITALY
Giorgio Bonsanti

29-36
PROFESSIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY POSITION AND ROLE OF ACADEMIC CONSERVATOR-RESTORERS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Methodical symbiosis and transdisciplinary cooperation using the example of the rebuilding and conservation of two Ottoman palaces in Istanbul
Jörg Breitenfeldt

37-42
INTEGRATION OF BRANDI’S THEORY IN THE CONTEXT OF EASTERN RELIGIONS AND CULTURES
Francesca Capanna

43-52
RETHINKING MAIURI: ENHANCEMENT OF STUCCO FINDINGS FROM THE HERCULANEUM ARCHAEOLOGICAL PARKq
Filippo Edoardo Capasso, Francesca Castiello, Simona Dichiara, Manuel Giandomenico, Natalie Iacopino, Erika Maddalena, Camilla Mauri, Sokol Muca, Mariagiulia Roscigno, Sofia Schiattone

53-64
THE METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CONSERVATION DATA FOR STUCCO ARTIFACTS
Filippo Edoardo Capasso, Francesca Castiello, Simona Dichiara, Manuel Giandomenico, Natalie Iacopino, Erika Maddalena, Camilla Mauri, Sokol Muca, Mariagiulia Roscigno, Sofia Schiattone

65-72
THE STUCCO DECORATION OF THE MONUMENTAL ARCH ON THE DECUMANUS MAXIMUS AT HERCULANEUM
Marina Caso

73-78
“CONSERVATION VERSUS RECONSTRUCTION.” DO WE NEED OTHER OR NEW CRITERIA FOR CONSERVING ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES OF THE 20THCENTURY?
Thomas Danzl

89-102
THE CONSERVATION-RESTORATION OF ARCHITECTURAL STATUARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCULPTURE AND ARCHITECTURE
Camille De Clercq, Judy De Roy

103-112
LUCIO FONTANA AND ARCHITECTURE
Barbara Ferriani

113-122
AWARENESS OF MATERIALITY IN TIME AND CONDITION. THOUGHTS ON THE RELATION BETWEEN ART HISTORY AND CONSERVATION
Andreas Huth, Katharine Stahlbuhk

123-138
„BEFORE WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE DOING, WE NEED TO KNOW HOW WE THINK”
Dörthe Jakobs

139-150
THE TEMPLE OF EPICURIOUS APOLLO AT BASSAE: PRESERVE THE STONE OR UNCOVER ITS TRUE NATURE?
Eva Kapadoukaki, Michail Soumas

151-158
GIOTTO’S STIGMATIZATION OF SAINT FRANCIS: AN APPROACH FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE IMAGE
Maria Rosa Lanfranchi

159-174
ETHICS AND BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RESTORING HISTORICAL STONE MONUMENTS
Jadwiga W. Łukaszewicz

175-184
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
Helia Marcal

185-210
VIRTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION VS. ACTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN THE CONSERVATION OF FRAGMENTARY ARTEFACTS: THE CASE STUDY FRESCOES FROM SYBARIS - COPIA (ITALY)
Sokol Muca

211-222
CONSERVATION-RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION SCIENCE - THE CHALLENGE OF TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
Mechthild Noll-Minor

223-238
QUALITY PARAMETERS IN CONSERVATION-RESTORATION CHOICES – THE CASE OF THE TOWER OF THE WINDS IN ATHENS
Maria Papadopoulou, Andromache Gazi

239-254
ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN THE CONSERVATION OF THE WALL PAINTINGS OF CHAPEL 11 AT THE SACRO MONTE DI VARALLO
Francesca Piqué, Giacinta Jean

255-268
UNITÉ DE DOCTRINE – CONTINGENCY OF PRACTICE? TOWARDS A RE-READING OF TWENTIETH CENTURY PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING HERITAGE CONSERVATION
Andreas Putz

269-280
THE VOICE OF CONSERVATION-RESTORATION ON MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESTORATION PROJECTS
Tanja Røskar

281-290
CONSERVATION ETHICS TODAY: ARE OUR CONSERVATION-RESTORATION THEORIES AND PRACTICE READY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY? INTRODUCTORY NOTES TO SOME CENTRAL ISSUES
Ursula Schädler-Saub

291-300
DEALING WITH AUTHENTICITY IN THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF WALL PAINTINGS AND ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES
Ursula Schädler-Saub

301-324
THE CONSERVATOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DETERIORATION OF MONUMENTS
Bogusław Szmygin

325-333

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.1087

Authors

Sokol Muca

hfh.icomos@gmail.com

Higher School of Conservation and Restoration of the Cultural Heritage in Matera, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-5969

Abstract

This article discusses the role that new digital technologies play on conservation-restoration of fragmentary artefacts. Above all, the use of these tools is essential in case the artefacts have lost the formal unity and reach us without documentation concerning their original position, as in the case of the Roman frescoes from Sybaris, object of this study. The creation of virtual models proves as fundamental for the material and formal recomposition of the artefacts, especially in the creation of a new support and display choices. This last aspect required an analysis on the effects that virtual reconstructions and augmented reality have on visitors.

Keywords:

3D, Augmented Reality, perception, Virtual restoration, Roman frescos

References

Arnheim, R. (Ed.) (1954). Art and Visual Perception. A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California.
Brandi, C. (1963). Teoria del restauro: lezioni raccolte da L. Vlad. Borrelli, J. Raspi Serra, G. Urbani ... Con una bibliografia generale dell’autore. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura.
Brandi, C. (1977). Teoria del restauro. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore - Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi Ns.
Brandi, C. (2005). Theory of Restoration. Edited by Giuseppe Basile and the Istituto Centrale per il Restauro, translated by Cynthia Rockwell. With presentations by Giuliano Urbani, Nicholas Stanley-Price, Caterina Bon Valsassina, with texts by Giuseppe Basile, Paul Philippot, Giulio Carlo Argan, Cesare Brandi. Firenze: Nardini editore.
Cornell, R. M & Schwertmann, U. (1996). The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions, occurrence, and uses (p. 29 ). New York: WILEY-VCH.
Eastaugh, N., Walsh, V., Chaplin, T. & Siddall, R. (Eds.) (2004). The Pigment Compendium. (p.201). Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Forte, M. & Beltrami, R. (2000). A proposito di virtual Archaeology: disordini, interazioni cognitive virtualitá. In: Archeologia e Calcolatori n. XI, Moscati, P. (Ed.), pp. 273-300.
Forte, M. (2008). Virtual archaeology. Communication in 3D and ecological thinking. In: Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery. In: Archaeology, ArcheoPress, Oxford, pp. 20- 34.
Foti, G. (1969, October). L’attività archeologica in Calabria. In: La Magna Grecia nel mondo ellenistico, IX(LIV), Taranto, pp. 166-171.
Gombrich, E. (1982). The Image and the Eye. Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Oxford: Phaidon.
Guzzo, G. (1971, Sept./Oct.). III campagna di scavi nella piana del Crati. In: Magna Grecia, anno VI, nr. 9-10, Taranto, pp. 21-24.
Guzzo, G. (1972, October). La documentazione archeologica in Calabria. In: Magna Grecia, XII(LIV), Taranto, pp. 341-345.
Limoncelli, M. (2012). Il progetto “Hierapolis Virtuale” esperienze di restauro virtuale e restituzione in 3D. In: D’Andria, R. & Mannino, K. (Eds.). Gli allievi raccontano (pp.247-253). Galatina: Congedo.
Lopez-Menchero Bendicho V. M. & Flores Gutierrez, M. & Vincent, M. L. & Grande Leon, A. (2017). Digital Heritage and Virtual Archaeology: An Approach Through the Framework of International Recommendations. In: E Levy, T (Ed.). Digital Heritage and Virtual Archaeology in the Digital Age: Acquisition, Curation, and Dissemination of Spatial Cultural Heritage Data (p. 594). Murcia: Springer Verlag.
Rossi Pinelli, O. (2005). Verso un’immagine integrale: derestauri e rirestauri nelle esperienza contemporanee. In: Piva. C & Sgarbozza, I. (Eds.). Il corpo dello stile (pp. 119-134). Roma: De Luca Editori d’Arte.
Settis, S. (2002). L’illusione dei beni digitali. In: Bollettino ICR-Nuova serie, N. 5, (pp. 18-20). Firenze: Nardini Editore.
King’s College London (7 Febrary 2009): The London Charter. Retrived from http//www.londoncharter.org
International Forum Of Virtual Archaeology (2011): The Seville Principles. Retrived from http://www.arqueologiavirtual.com/carta

Muca, S. (2019). VIRTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION VS. ACTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN THE CONSERVATION OF FRAGMENTARY ARTEFACTS: THE CASE STUDY FRESCOES FROM SYBARIS - COPIA (ITALY). Protection of Cultural Heritage, (8), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.1087

Author Biography

Sokol Muca, Higher School of Conservation and Restoration of the Cultural Heritage in Matera

Student at the ISCR, Higher School of Conservation and Restoration of the Cultural Heritage, in Matera, Italy. His Supervisors: Maria Carolina Gaetani, ISCR, Conservator, and Giorgio Sobrà, ISCR, Architect, Director of the Higher School of Conservation and Restoration of the Cultural Heritage, in Matera. The Chief Supervisor is Giovanna De Palma, ISCR, Archaeologis

Article Sidebar

Issue No. 8 (2019)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

Sokol Muca, Higher School of Conservation and Restoration of the Cultural Heritage in Matera