What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)
-
The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković7-15
-
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi16-22
-
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova23-35
-
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad36-51
-
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych52-63
-
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić64-70
-
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li71-83
-
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski84-95
-
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy96-100
-
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana101-113
-
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk114-122
-
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto123-139
-
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue140-150
-
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu151-161
-
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus162-170
-
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina171-181
-
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė182-195
-
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung196-210
-
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva211-221
-
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang222-233
-
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura235-245
-
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf246-255
-
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub256-266
-
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas267-278
-
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev279-287
-
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash288-292
-
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko293-300
-
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li301-309
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The improper allocation of economic and environmental resources damages the United Nations sustainable development Agenda, which remains a challenge for policymakers to stop the rot through efficient governance mechanisms. The study designed an efficient environmental governance framework by extending the different governance factors linked to the environmental sustainability ratings in the cross-section of 67 countries. The results of the two-regime based estimator show that environmental corruption (regime-1), environmental politics (regime-2), and environmental laws (regime-2) negatively correlated with the environmental sustainability rating, whereas environmental democracy (regime-1 & 2) positively correlated with the environmental sustainability agenda across countries. The government effectiveness and the country’s per capita income both escalates environmental sustainability ratings. The results align with the Demopolis theory, the effective regulatory theory, and the theory of law and politics. The causality estimates show that environmental corruption and government effectiveness causes environmental politics and economic growth. In contrast, environmental democracy and environmental regulations cause a country’s per capita income. The bidirectional causality is found between environmental regulations and environmental corruption on the one hand, while environmental regulations and environmental politics Granger cause each other on the other hand. The results show the importance of environmental regulations in managing ecological corruption and politics across countries. The variance decomposition analysis suggested that environmental politics likely influenced the environmental sustainability agenda, followed by government effectiveness and environmental democracy for the next ten years. The study emphasized the need to design an efficient environmental governance framework that minimizes environmental corruption and enables them to move towards environmental democracy, stringent environmental laws, and regulations. Government effectiveness would mainly be linked to reducing corruption and political instability to achieve clean, green and sustainable development.
Keywords:
References
ADAMS D., ADAMS K., ULLAH S., ULLAH F., 2019, Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socioeconomic growth of oil-rich developing countries, Resources Policy, 61: 128-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.009
ADEKUNLE I.A., 2021, On the search for environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of governance, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12): 14607-14620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11432-5
AGUILERA R.V., ARAGÓN-CORREA J.A., MARANO V., TASHMAN P.A., 2021, The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research, Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760077
AHMED Z., CARY M., LE H. P., 2021, Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: an aggregated and disaggregated investigation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86:106511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511
ANSER M. K., AHMAD M., KHAN M. A., NASSAN, A. A., ASKAR S. E., ZAMAN K., KABBANI A., 2021, Progress in nuclear energy with carbon pricing to achieve environmental sustainability agenda: on the edge of one’s seat, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y
ARMINEN H., MENEGAKI A.N., 2019, Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus, Energy Economics, 80: 621-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.009
ASONGU S.A., ODHIAMBO N.M., 2021, Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 39(1): 444-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719900657
BARBOSA L.G., ALVES M.A.S., GRELLE C.E. V., 2021, Actions against sustainability: Dismantling of the environmental policies in Brazil, Land Use Policy, 104: 105384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105384
BENNETT N.J., SATTERFIELD T., 2018, Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis, Conservation Letters, 11(6): e12600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600
CHENG R., LI W., LU Z., ZHOU S., MENG C., 2020, Integrating the three-line environmental governance and environmental sustainability evaluation of urban industry in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121554
COENEN J., BAGER S., MEYFROIDT P., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., 2021, Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative, Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(1): 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1901
DRESSEL S., SJÖLANDER-LINDQVIST A., JOHANSSON M., ERICSSON G., SANDSTRÖM C., 2021, Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management, Sustainability, 13(4): 2329, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329
GANDA F., 2020, The influence of corruption on environmental sustainability in the developing economies of Southern Africa, Heliyon, 6(7): e04387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04387
GIANNETTI B.F., AGOSTINHO F., ERAS J.C., YANG Z., ALMEIDA C.M.V.B., 2020, Cleaner production for achieving the sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 271:122127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122127
GIESEKE T., 2020, Collaborative Environmental Governance Frameworks: A Practical Guide. CRC Press, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, UK, https://www.routledge.com/Collaborative-Environmental-Governance-Frameworks-A-Practical-Guide/Gieseke/p/book/9781138584501# (16-07-2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429505973
GÖK A., SODHI N., 2021, The environmental impact of governance: a system-generalized method of moments analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 32995-33008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12903-z
GUPTA A.C., CHATTERJEE N., 2021, Economic Values for the Environment with Special Reference to the Contingent Valuation Method, Environmental Management: Issues and Concerns in Developing Countries, ed. Sikdar P.K., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14
GUPTA, A., BOAS I., OOSTERVEER P., 2020, Transparency in global sustainability governance: to what effect?, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(1): 84-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1709281
HASEEB M., ZAM M., 2021, Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4):5557-5575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00832-9
JAGER N.W., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., KOCHSKÄMPER E., 2020, Pathways to implementation: Evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3): 383-399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz034
JIANG X., LI G., FU W., 2021, Government environmental governance, structural adjustment and air quality: A quasi-natural experiment based on the three-year action plan to win the blue sky defense war, Journal of Environmental Management, 277:111470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111470
KAGAYA S., WADA T., 2021, The application of environmental governance for sustainable watershed-based management, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(2): 643-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00185-1
KAMAH M., RITI J. S., BIN P., 2021, Inclusive growth and environmental sustainability: the role of institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z
KHAN H., WEILI L., KHAN I., 2021, Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y
LAWLESS S., SONG A. M., COHEN P. J., MORRISON T. H., 2020, Rights, equity and justice: a diagnostic for social meta-norm diffusion in environmental governance, Earth System Governance, 6:100052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100052
LE H. P., SARKODIE S.A., 2020, Dynamic linkage between renewable and conventional energy use, environmental quality and economic growth: evidence from Emerging Market and Developing Economies, Energy Reports, 6: 965-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.020
LEAL P.H., MARQUES A.C., 2021, The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption: Evidence from a set of African countries, Environmental Science & Policy, 115: 116-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.013
MAZUR K., TOMASHUK I., 2019, Governance and regulation as an indispensable condition for developing the potential of rural areas, Baltic journal of economic studies, 5(5): 67-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-67-78
MOUSSA T., KOTB A., HELFAYA A., 2021, An Empirical Investigation of UK Environmental Targets Disclosure: The Role of Environmental Governance and Performance, European Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173
MURSHED M., RAHMAN M.A., ALAM M.S., AHMAD P., DAGAR V., 2021, The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z
NGUYEN B., 2021, Does Local Environmental Governance Improve Tourism Companies’ Performance? Evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Travel Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653
PASGAARD M., VAN HECKEN G., EHAMMER A., STRANGE N., 2017, Unfolding scientific expertise and security in the changing governance of Ecosystem Services, Geoforum, 84: 354-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.001
PEKER E., ATAÖV A., 2021, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Scale Matters!, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities. The Urban Book Series, eds. Peker E., Ataöv A., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5
PICKERING J., BÄCKSTRAND K., SCHLOSBERG D., 2020, Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276
QUANDT R.E., 1972, A new approach to estimating switching regressions, Journal of the American statistical association, 67(338): 306-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482378
QURESHI M.I., QAYYUM S., NASSAN A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ABRO M.M.Q., ZAMAN K., 2019, Management of various socio-economic factors under the United Nations sustainable development agenda, Resources Policy, 64: 101515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101515
RAJESH, R., 2020, Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247: 119600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119600
RAJESH, R., RAJENDRAN, C., 2020, Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3): 1247-1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2429
RAJMOHAN K.V.S., RAMYA C., VISWANATHAN M.R., VARJANI S., 2019, Plastic pollutants: effective waste management for pollution control and abatement, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 12: 72-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.08.006
RAMZAN S., LIU C., MUNIR H., XU Y., 2019, Assessing young consumers’ awareness and participation in sustainable e-waste management practices: a survey study in Northwest China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19): 20003-20013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05310-y
REED G., BRUNET N.D., LONGBOAT S., NATCHER D.C., 2021, Indigenous guardians as an emerging approach to indigenous environmental governance, Conservation Biology, 35(1): 179-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13532
SAVAGE J.M., HUDSON M.D., OSBORNE P.E., 2020, The challenges of establishing marine protected areas in South East Asia, Marine protected areas, Elsevier:343-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102698-4.00018-6
SUN H., MOHSIN M., ALHARTHI M., ABBAS Q., 2020, Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 251: 119519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
TACCONI L., WILLIAMS D.A., 2020, Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Environmental and Resource Management, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45: 305-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083949
TAN Y., GENG Y., 2020, Coupling coordination measurement of environmental governance: case of China, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 27(2): 253-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00444-6
THALER G.M., 2021, Ethnography of environmental governance: Towards an organizational approach, Geoforum, 120: 122-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.026
USMAN O., OLANIPEKUN I.O., IOREMBER P. T., ABU-GOODMAN M., 2020, Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8): 8334-8349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6
VAN ASSCHE K., BEUNEN R., GRUEZMACHER M., DUINEVELD M., 2020, Rethinking strategy in environmental governance, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5): 695-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1768834
WANG S., WANG H., WANG J., YANG F., 2020, Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism, Science of the Total Environment, 714: 136855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136855
WGI 2021, World governance indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
WILLIAMS A., DUPUY K., 2017, Deciding over nature: Corruption and environmental impact assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65: 118-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002
WORLD BANK 2021, World development indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
ZAMAN K., AZIZ A.R.A., SRIYANTO S., INDRIANTI Y., JAMBARI H., 2021, The role of solar energy demand in the relationship between carbon pricing and environmental degradation: A blessing in disguise, Journal of Public Affairs, e2702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2702
ZHANG J., CHANG Y., ZHANG L., LI D., 2018, Do technological innovations promote urban green development? – A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China, Journal of cleaner production, 182: 395-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.067
Article Details
Abstract views: 215
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
